<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EDITORIAL: Deconstructing the neocon nuclear narrative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://warincontext.org/2007/09/21/editorial-deconstructing-the-neocon-nuclear-narrative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://warincontext.org/2007/09/21/editorial-deconstructing-the-neocon-nuclear-narrative/</link>
	<description>... with attention to the unseen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:16:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blacksmith Jade</title>
		<link>http://warincontext.org/2007/09/21/editorial-deconstructing-the-neocon-nuclear-narrative/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Blacksmith Jade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warincontext.org/2007/09/21/editorial-deconstructing-the-neocon-nuclear-narrative/#comment-142</guid>
		<description>Oh, and here is the link to the piece I wrote:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://blacksmithsoflebanon.blogspot.com/2007/10/peace-in-lebanon-and-trouble-in-syria.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Trouble in Syria and Peace in Lebanon&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and here is the link to the piece I wrote:</p>
<p><a href="http://blacksmithsoflebanon.blogspot.com/2007/10/peace-in-lebanon-and-trouble-in-syria.html" rel="nofollow">Trouble in Syria and Peace in Lebanon</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blacksmith Jade</title>
		<link>http://warincontext.org/2007/09/21/editorial-deconstructing-the-neocon-nuclear-narrative/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Blacksmith Jade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warincontext.org/2007/09/21/editorial-deconstructing-the-neocon-nuclear-narrative/#comment-141</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul,

I put up a similar piece several weeks ago.  While your take is negative on the &quot;option&quot; of an assault on Syria, however, mine is that of cautious optimism...very cautious optimism. 

My positive attitude towards such a hit stems from my being in Lebanon and having witnessed first hand the Syrian dictatorship&#039;s historical (and continuing) use of instruments of terror on my countrymen and women.  The argument, which I&#039;m neither wholly convinced of nor willing to completely disregard, is that a hit on Syria would dislodge the assassin-regime there and provide the Lebanese with a respite from the ongoing assault on the state and the anti-Syrian parliamentary majority we&#039;ve been subject to.  Any negative fallout from the hit could be limited to Syria - and not Lebanon - by the fact that the dislodging of the regime would free those pro-Syrian elements active in the country from the obligation to go down with the sinking regime&#039;s ship and realign with the more US-friendly political movements.  This argument, holds most true for the Christians among the pro-Syrian ranks.  For the Shiites, there will continue to be Hizballah - fully armed, trained, and funded from Iran - but they would surely find an untrusting partner in Amal and its leader Nabih Berri, who is a political chamellion well-acquainted with the business of realignment.

As for extremist Sunni groups present in Lebanon, there is a danger that turmoil in Syria would provide a magnet for global jihadists.  In Lebanon, however, the presence of such groups has, for the most part, been an integral strategy of the Syrian regime&#039;s strategy for interfering in our internal affairs.  Generally, the strategy is made up of creating instability in Lebanon and then &quot;coming to our aide&quot;.  A dislodgement of the Syrian regime would provide a break in the central nervous system coordinating these groups across the country, allowing the Lebanese Army to (hopefully) finish them off one at a time.

Anyway, its a risky move, thats for sure, and yes it is absolutely part of the build up towards eventually knocking off Iran.  But from the standpoint of a Lebanese who is tired of seeing his country being used as a limb of Iran&#039;s regional policy (through Hizballah) and as a playground for Syria&#039;s looting and assissinating intelligence agencies and regime, it might just be worth the risk.

On another note, I&#039;m always interested in engaging people with varying opinions on the web.  If you&#039;re interested in a blog links exchange, feel free to email me at blacksmithsoflebanon@gmail.com

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul,</p>
<p>I put up a similar piece several weeks ago.  While your take is negative on the &#8220;option&#8221; of an assault on Syria, however, mine is that of cautious optimism&#8230;very cautious optimism. </p>
<p>My positive attitude towards such a hit stems from my being in Lebanon and having witnessed first hand the Syrian dictatorship&#8217;s historical (and continuing) use of instruments of terror on my countrymen and women.  The argument, which I&#8217;m neither wholly convinced of nor willing to completely disregard, is that a hit on Syria would dislodge the assassin-regime there and provide the Lebanese with a respite from the ongoing assault on the state and the anti-Syrian parliamentary majority we&#8217;ve been subject to.  Any negative fallout from the hit could be limited to Syria &#8211; and not Lebanon &#8211; by the fact that the dislodging of the regime would free those pro-Syrian elements active in the country from the obligation to go down with the sinking regime&#8217;s ship and realign with the more US-friendly political movements.  This argument, holds most true for the Christians among the pro-Syrian ranks.  For the Shiites, there will continue to be Hizballah &#8211; fully armed, trained, and funded from Iran &#8211; but they would surely find an untrusting partner in Amal and its leader Nabih Berri, who is a political chamellion well-acquainted with the business of realignment.</p>
<p>As for extremist Sunni groups present in Lebanon, there is a danger that turmoil in Syria would provide a magnet for global jihadists.  In Lebanon, however, the presence of such groups has, for the most part, been an integral strategy of the Syrian regime&#8217;s strategy for interfering in our internal affairs.  Generally, the strategy is made up of creating instability in Lebanon and then &#8220;coming to our aide&#8221;.  A dislodgement of the Syrian regime would provide a break in the central nervous system coordinating these groups across the country, allowing the Lebanese Army to (hopefully) finish them off one at a time.</p>
<p>Anyway, its a risky move, thats for sure, and yes it is absolutely part of the build up towards eventually knocking off Iran.  But from the standpoint of a Lebanese who is tired of seeing his country being used as a limb of Iran&#8217;s regional policy (through Hizballah) and as a playground for Syria&#8217;s looting and assissinating intelligence agencies and regime, it might just be worth the risk.</p>
<p>On another note, I&#8217;m always interested in engaging people with varying opinions on the web.  If you&#8217;re interested in a blog links exchange, feel free to email me at <a href="mailto:blacksmithsoflebanon@gmail.com">blacksmithsoflebanon@gmail.com</a></p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EDITORIAL: Why the nuclear story isn&#8217;t nuclear</title>
		<link>http://warincontext.org/2007/09/21/editorial-deconstructing-the-neocon-nuclear-narrative/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>EDITORIAL: Why the nuclear story isn&#8217;t nuclear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warincontext.org/2007/09/21/editorial-deconstructing-the-neocon-nuclear-narrative/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>[...] in eastern Syria, we finally know that this really was something really big that went down: it was nuclear! The Syrians had &#8220;nuclear materials&#8221; that have been traced to North Korea. Except&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in eastern Syria, we finally know that this really was something really big that went down: it was nuclear! The Syrians had &#8220;nuclear materials&#8221; that have been traced to North Korea. Except&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
