<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NEWS &amp; ANALYSIS &amp; EDITOR&#8217;S COMMENT: Let&#8217;s push up the price of oil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://warincontext.org/2008/07/01/news-analysis-editors-comment-lets-push-up-the-price-of-oil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://warincontext.org/2008/07/01/news-analysis-editors-comment-lets-push-up-the-price-of-oil/</link>
	<description>... with attention to the unseen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:49:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yigal Arens</title>
		<link>http://warincontext.org/2008/07/01/news-analysis-editors-comment-lets-push-up-the-price-of-oil/comment-page-1/#comment-2356</link>
		<dc:creator>Yigal Arens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warincontext.org/?p=1166#comment-2356</guid>
		<description>With all the attack threats, implied and overt, that Israel has been issuing against Iran, wouldn&#039;t Iran be justified in preemptively attacking Israel? I mean, it makes no sense for Iran to just sit around and wait until Israel was good and ready to bomb them.  They may consider it better to set the time for a conflict with Israel when *they* find it convenient.

A doctrine of preemptive war works both ways...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the attack threats, implied and overt, that Israel has been issuing against Iran, wouldn&#8217;t Iran be justified in preemptively attacking Israel? I mean, it makes no sense for Iran to just sit around and wait until Israel was good and ready to bomb them.  They may consider it better to set the time for a conflict with Israel when *they* find it convenient.</p>
<p>A doctrine of preemptive war works both ways&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G Hazeltine</title>
		<link>http://warincontext.org/2008/07/01/news-analysis-editors-comment-lets-push-up-the-price-of-oil/comment-page-1/#comment-2346</link>
		<dc:creator>G Hazeltine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warincontext.org/?p=1166#comment-2346</guid>
		<description>A little more on the issues raised by Millennium Challenge 2002:

A longer article on the Millennium Challenge exercise:

http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2002/020906-iraq1.htm 

Some information on various anti-ship missiles, some, or their variants, known to be deployed by the Iranians, perhaps in large numbers:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exocet 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silkworm_missile 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C-802 

Why in the confined waters of the Gulf being prepared for an attack by these missiles might not matter. See page six of the following:

http://www.ausairpower.net/ascms.pdf 

A long and well sourced paper on the history and current scope of Iranian asymmetric naval warfare doctrine and capabilities, from the Marshall Center:

http://www.marshallcenter.org/site-graphic/lang-de/page-coll-research-1/static/xdocs/research/static/occpapers/occ-paper_10-en.pdf

The US failed utterly to find, much less destroy Iraq&#039;s scud missiles. The Israelis failed utterly to suppress Hezbollah&#039;s rocket fire in 2006. The Iranians are known to manufacture the Noor missile, a possibly upgraded version of the C-802, with a range sufficient to turn most of the Gulf into a kill zone, and have had years prepare for conflict in the Gulf. There is little reason to suppose that their capabilities will be any more susceptible to countermeasures than Iraq&#039;s scuds or Hezbollah&#039;s rockets. If they are not suppressed the consequences to US naval forces in the Gulf will be very grave. Add to this the small boats, the mines, and other Iranian capabilities - and the clear lessons of the Millennium Challenge exercise - one wonders why the threat to the large number of American warships stationed in the Persian Gulf receives so little attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little more on the issues raised by Millennium Challenge 2002:</p>
<p>A longer article on the Millennium Challenge exercise:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2002/020906-iraq1.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2002/020906-iraq1.htm</a> </p>
<p>Some information on various anti-ship missiles, some, or their variants, known to be deployed by the Iranians, perhaps in large numbers:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exocet" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exocet</a><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silkworm_missile" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silkworm_missile</a><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C-802" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C-802</a> </p>
<p>Why in the confined waters of the Gulf being prepared for an attack by these missiles might not matter. See page six of the following:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ausairpower.net/ascms.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.ausairpower.net/ascms.pdf</a> </p>
<p>A long and well sourced paper on the history and current scope of Iranian asymmetric naval warfare doctrine and capabilities, from the Marshall Center:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.marshallcenter.org/site-graphic/lang-de/page-coll-research-1/static/xdocs/research/static/occpapers/occ-paper_10-en.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.marshallcenter.org/site-graphic/lang-de/page-coll-research-1/static/xdocs/research/static/occpapers/occ-paper_10-en.pdf</a></p>
<p>The US failed utterly to find, much less destroy Iraq&#8217;s scud missiles. The Israelis failed utterly to suppress Hezbollah&#8217;s rocket fire in 2006. The Iranians are known to manufacture the Noor missile, a possibly upgraded version of the C-802, with a range sufficient to turn most of the Gulf into a kill zone, and have had years prepare for conflict in the Gulf. There is little reason to suppose that their capabilities will be any more susceptible to countermeasures than Iraq&#8217;s scuds or Hezbollah&#8217;s rockets. If they are not suppressed the consequences to US naval forces in the Gulf will be very grave. Add to this the small boats, the mines, and other Iranian capabilities &#8211; and the clear lessons of the Millennium Challenge exercise &#8211; one wonders why the threat to the large number of American warships stationed in the Persian Gulf receives so little attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

