<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iran&#8217;s younger, smarter revolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://warincontext.org/2010/01/03/irans-younger-smarter-revolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://warincontext.org/2010/01/03/irans-younger-smarter-revolution/</link>
	<description>... with attention to the unseen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:49:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eatbees</title>
		<link>http://warincontext.org/2010/01/03/irans-younger-smarter-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-7125</link>
		<dc:creator>eatbees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warincontext.org/?p=2722#comment-7125</guid>
		<description>An interesting contrast between two points of view. I find Sahimi&#039;s article to be more serious-minded. I doubt it&#039;s possible to have a free-form revolution based on twitter feeds and poetry. Calling a movement &quot;inherently victorious&quot; won&#039;t make it so. Even if the majority in Iran now favors the opposition, I suspect that the majority of that majority doesn&#039;t want to go through yet another social upheaval like 1979. What&#039;s needed is a stepwise transition to a more open system, not revolution in the streets. The street movement has a right to keep the pressure on, but overstepping will lead to a crackdown and civil chaos. Meanwhile, by destiny of geography, Iran must play a careful game in the face of conflicting pressures from Russia, China, the Arab world and the West. This requires continuity and experienced hands at the helm. The under-30 crowd may be the majority, but they can&#039;t do it on their own. A coalition with some faction of existing leadership is needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting contrast between two points of view. I find Sahimi&#8217;s article to be more serious-minded. I doubt it&#8217;s possible to have a free-form revolution based on twitter feeds and poetry. Calling a movement &#8220;inherently victorious&#8221; won&#8217;t make it so. Even if the majority in Iran now favors the opposition, I suspect that the majority of that majority doesn&#8217;t want to go through yet another social upheaval like 1979. What&#8217;s needed is a stepwise transition to a more open system, not revolution in the streets. The street movement has a right to keep the pressure on, but overstepping will lead to a crackdown and civil chaos. Meanwhile, by destiny of geography, Iran must play a careful game in the face of conflicting pressures from Russia, China, the Arab world and the West. This requires continuity and experienced hands at the helm. The under-30 crowd may be the majority, but they can&#8217;t do it on their own. A coalition with some faction of existing leadership is needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

