<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Netanyahu threatens American interests</title>
	<atom:link href="http://warincontext.org/2010/03/19/netanyahu-threatens-american-interests/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://warincontext.org/2010/03/19/netanyahu-threatens-american-interests/</link>
	<description>... with attention to the unseen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 19:47:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Johnson</title>
		<link>http://warincontext.org/2010/03/19/netanyahu-threatens-american-interests/comment-page-1/#comment-8672</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warincontext.org/?p=4219#comment-8672</guid>
		<description>I find it odd and funny that Wolf Blitzer, a known zionist, who worked for AIPAC can be a &quot;unbiased&quot; moderator for the Palestine/Israel conflict...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it odd and funny that Wolf Blitzer, a known zionist, who worked for AIPAC can be a &#8220;unbiased&#8221; moderator for the Palestine/Israel conflict&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Hoare</title>
		<link>http://warincontext.org/2010/03/19/netanyahu-threatens-american-interests/comment-page-1/#comment-8642</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Hoare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warincontext.org/?p=4219#comment-8642</guid>
		<description>Netanyahu is a sick man. He should no more be running the lives of his fellows than Hitler should have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Netanyahu is a sick man. He should no more be running the lives of his fellows than Hitler should have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William deB. Mills</title>
		<link>http://warincontext.org/2010/03/19/netanyahu-threatens-american-interests/comment-page-1/#comment-8640</link>
		<dc:creator>William deB. Mills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warincontext.org/?p=4219#comment-8640</guid>
		<description>I thought everyone had forgotten the sadly outdated concept of the U.S. as an &quot;honest broker&quot; between Israel and Palestine, but since the lead photo in the McCafferty File video above refers to that concept, readers may be interested in the graphic at http://shadowedforest.blogspot.com/2010/03/placing-all-options-on-palestinian.html (I would have inserted it if I had known how) which shows how far Washington would have to go to mount the pedestal of &quot;Honest Brokership.&quot; Admittedly, that&#039;s a negative perspective.

The positive perspective is that Washington has an enormous array of very moderate policy options that it could adopt even without going so far as becoming anything like an &quot;honest broker&quot; with an impartial attitude, without impairing Israeli security, without ending the US-Israeli alliance, without even creating a Palestinian state (much less a viable, geographically continuous, defensible Palestinian state). 

What Washington would have to do is focus on working with groups willing to bring a constructive attitude to the negotiating table rather than putting its eggs blindly in the basket of whatever Israeli politician happens to win an election. When Washington accepts that the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and the U.S.-Israeli alliance are all about three interacting societies, rather than being about some individual politician, then an historic breakthrough will have been achieved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought everyone had forgotten the sadly outdated concept of the U.S. as an &#8220;honest broker&#8221; between Israel and Palestine, but since the lead photo in the McCafferty File video above refers to that concept, readers may be interested in the graphic at <a href="http://shadowedforest.blogspot.com/2010/03/placing-all-options-on-palestinian.html" rel="nofollow">http://shadowedforest.blogspot.com/2010/03/placing-all-options-on-palestinian.html</a> (I would have inserted it if I had known how) which shows how far Washington would have to go to mount the pedestal of &#8220;Honest Brokership.&#8221; Admittedly, that&#8217;s a negative perspective.</p>
<p>The positive perspective is that Washington has an enormous array of very moderate policy options that it could adopt even without going so far as becoming anything like an &#8220;honest broker&#8221; with an impartial attitude, without impairing Israeli security, without ending the US-Israeli alliance, without even creating a Palestinian state (much less a viable, geographically continuous, defensible Palestinian state). </p>
<p>What Washington would have to do is focus on working with groups willing to bring a constructive attitude to the negotiating table rather than putting its eggs blindly in the basket of whatever Israeli politician happens to win an election. When Washington accepts that the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and the U.S.-Israeli alliance are all about three interacting societies, rather than being about some individual politician, then an historic breakthrough will have been achieved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

