|
|
|
|
|
alternative perspectives on the "war on terrorism"
|
What price Oslo?
Edward Said, Al-Ahram Weekly, March 14, 2002
As an index of how deranged Sharon has become, I might quote here
what he said to Ha'aretz on 5 March: "The PA is behind the terror, it's
all terror. Arafat is behind the terror. Our pressure is aimed at ending
the terror. Don't expect Arafat to act against the terror. We have to
cause them heavy casualties and then they'll know they can't keep using
terror and win political achievements."
Besides symptomatically revealing the workings of an obsessed
mind bent on destruction and sheer, unadulterated hatred, Sharon's words
indicate the failures of reason and criticism loosed on the world since
last September. Yes, there was a terrorist outrage, but there's more to
the world than terror. There is politics, and struggle, and history,
and injustice, and resistance and yes, state terror as well. With
scarcely a peep from the American professorate or intelligentsia, we
have all succumbed to the promiscuous misuse of language and sense, by
which everything we don't like has become terror and what we do is pure
and simple good -- fighting terror, no matter how much wealth, and
lives, and destruction is involved. Swept away are all the Enlightenment
precepts by which we attempt to educate our students and our-fellow
citizens, replaced by a disproportionate orgy of vindictiveness and
self-righteous wrath of the kind that only the wealthy and the powerful,
it would seem, have the right to use and act upon.
[The complete article]
Saddam Hussein: He wants war. And he thinks he's ready for it
Patrick Cockburn, The Independent, March 17, 2002
Saddam Hussein believes that war is coming. He has always had an
apocalyptic vision of himself as the Arab hero fighting the foreign
enemy to the last bullet. It is one of the few points in which he is in
agreement with the Iraqi opposition. They believe he will fight to the
end. "Even if the US or their allies ever take Baghdad he will shoot it
out from the last bunker," said a veteran opponent of the regime, who
has devoted his life to trying to overthrow the Iraqi dictator.
[The complete article]
Can free speech undermine freedom?
David Corn, Tom Paine.com, March 15, 2002
Fifty-eight years ago, when this country was engaged in World War
II, a battle for freedom and security, when American troops were
sacrificing their lives for the folks back home, the Republicans had no
problem running a candidate against the commander-in-chief, Franklin
Roosevelt, nor did the GOP nominee, Thomas Dewey, shrink from
criticizing FDR.
[The complete article]
Sharon’s lessons in terror
Neve Gordon, In These Times, March 15, 2002
It was on March 4, the day Israeli security forces killed 17
Palestinians—five of them children—that Prime Minister Ariel Sharon
called upon security forces to “increase the number of Palestinian
casualties” in order to “teach them a lesson.” One of the adult
fatalities was a 55-year-old woman from Jenin; another was Dr. Sliman
Khalil, who was slain while evacuating the injured from a nearby refugee
camp. “We must first strike the Palestinians a heavy blow before we can
begin negotiating peace,” Sharon said.
[The complete article]
Fragmented al Qaeda may be more deadly than ever
Paolo Pontoniere, Pacific News Service, March 12, 2002
The story of Carlos the Jackal, a terrorist who wreaked daily havoc
in Europe in the 1970s, forewarns that the breakup of al Qaeda might
spawn a headless, fragmented terror group more deadly than before.
[The complete article]
USA : Post 11 September detainees deprived of their basic rights
Amnesty International, March 14, 2002
Six months on from the 11 September attacks, a significant number of
people detained in the USA in their aftermath continue to be deprived
of some basic rights under international law, and many appear to have
been detained arbitrarily, Amnesty International said today.
[The complete article]
There is an echo of imperial Rome in Bush's war capital
America's choices are hardly being debated
Martin Woollacott, The Guardian, March 15, 2002
The wartime capital that is Washington today is a strange place.
There are workmen busy restoring the Pentagon to the state it was in
before September 11, and a few extra guards here and there. The city,
with its well kept public places, its slow traffic along rather inert
streets, and its stately morning streams of coffee-bearing commuters,
shows no other outward sign of being at the centre of a world conflict.
Yet, as if that was what the Dubya of his middle initial now stands for,
the word "war" itself is rarely off the president's lips, or those of
his ministers and advisers.
[The complete article]
FOCUS ON IRAQ:
Iraq: the myth and the reality
Julian Borger, Richard Norton-Taylor, Ewen MacAskill and Brian Whitaker, The Guardian, March 15, 2002
As the drumbeat grows louder for a possible attack on Baghdad, we
ask arms inspectors and military and foreign affairs experts: is Saddam
as dangerous as the US makes out, and what would be the consequences of
war?
[The complete article]
ISRAEL'S "WAR ON TERRORISM"
Slain MD had army's okay to collect medicines
Red Cross, rights groups protest killing of 5 Palestinian medical workers in last week
Amira Hass, Ha'aretz, March 10, 2002
The International Committee of the Red Cross has expressed outrage
at the killings by Israeli forces of Palestinian medical staff in the
West Bank and Gaza Strip. In a press conference in the West Bank town of
El-Bireh on Friday night, the head of the Red Cross delegation to
Israel and the Palestinian areas, Rene Kosirnik, said that in his 26
years with the Red Cross, this has been his "darkest week ever" with
regard to attacks on medical staff by military forces.
[The complete article]
Israeli raids have damaged 1,620 refugee homes
Amira Hass, Ha'aretz, March 12, 2002
The Israel Defense Forces' raids on Palestinian refugee camps over
the past ten days damaged a total of 1,620 residences and 14 public
institutions (mostly schools), according to preliminary investigations
conducted by representatives of UNRWA, the United Nations Relief and
Works Agency.
[The complete article]
Voice for Israel's enemy
Amira Hass is the only Jewish journalist living under Palestinian rule
Marjorie Miller, Los Angeles Times, March 15 2002
Hass says her beat is the "Israeli occupation." She chronicles
Israel's recent military thrusts into Ramallah and West Bank refugee
camps. She records the lives of ordinary Palestinians as they struggle
with checkpoints and the army's demolition of houses and farms. She
illustrates the day-to-day impact of Israel's economic chokehold on
Palestinian territories. In short, she provides an unrelenting account
of Palestinians as the victims of Israeli domination. In doing so, Hass
is celebrated by some Israelis as a national conscience and condemned by
others as an ideologue or even a traitor.
[The complete article]
FOLLOW THE MONEY
Company man
Tim Shorrock, The Nation, March 14, 2002
Last November Frank Carlucci, chairman of the Carlyle Group, spoke
to a conference on national security sponsored by the Pentagon and the
Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis, a conservative think tank where
he sits on the board of directors. His topic, "Employing the Instruments
of National Power in a Complex Environment," was a perfect metaphor for
Carlucci's career, which has taken him from the CIA to the highest
ranks of the defense and national security establishment and, finally,
to the top of one of the world's largest private equity funds.
Typically, Carlucci was introduced to his panel not as one of the
country's wealthiest executives but as National Security Adviser and
Defense Secretary during the Reagan Administration. Carlucci began by
praising the Bush Administration's conduct of the war. He didn't mention
that Carlyle's biggest defense company, United Defense Industries,
decided in the wake of September 11 to go public, a deal that would
raise the value of Carlucci's stake in that company to $1.2 million by
mid-March.
[The complete article]
Crony capitalism goes global
Tim Shorrock, The Nation, March 14, 2002
William Conway, managing director and co-founder of the Carlyle
Group, was talking recently about the media coverage of his bank and the
cast of ex-Presidents and former officials, including George H.W. Bush,
James Baker III and Frank Carlucci, on its payroll. "One of the words
that has recently cropped up as an adjective around us--and I love this
adjective--is the 'secretive' Carlyle Group," he said in an interview in
his offices overlooking Pennsylvania Avenue in downtown Washington.
"What's the secret? I don't think we have many secrets. The reality is,
we're a group of businessmen who have made an enormous amount of money
for our investors by making good investments over the past fifteen
years."
[The complete article]
The strange career of Frank Carlucci
Francis Schor, Counterpunch, February 1, 2002
In the past few months there has been a rash of media reports on the
Carlyle Group, a private equity investment group with billions of
dollars of assets in the defense industry and a roster of directors and
consultants which includes not only well-known Reagan and Bush
appointees but also international figures like John Major, the former
Prime Minister of Great Britain, and Fidel Ramos, the former President
of the Philippines. The Chairman of the Carlyle Group, Frank Carlucci,
was not only a former Secretary of Defense in the Reagan Administration,
but a Deputy Director of the CIA during the Carter Administration. In
fact, Carlucci's career in Washington provides some insight into the
intersection between foreign and domestic policy in the Cold War years.
[The complete article]
Judge's ruling challenges terrorism roadblocks
Says vague warnings can't be used to stop
Ralph Ranalli, Boston Globe, March 14, 2002
In one of the first decisions of its kind in the country, a judge
has thrown out all evidence against a suspected drunk driver stopped by
State Police near a reservoir a month after the Sept. 11 terrorist
attacks, ruling that stops based on nonspecific government warnings of
terrorist acts violate constitutional protections against unreasonable
searches and seizures.
[The complete article]
"OPERATION ANACONDA"
Taliban and Qaeda death toll in mountain battle is a mystery
Eric Schmitt and Thom Shanker, New York Times, March 14, 2002
The Pentagon now acknowledges that it badly underestimated the size
of Al Qaeda forces entering the battle. After initially putting the
count at 150 to 200 fighters, American intelligence officials now
believe as many as 1,000 were holed up in the battle zone.
[The complete article]
Ex-spy chief: Al Qaida has U.S. prisoners
Anwar Iqbal, UPI (via Insight), March 13, 2002
A former Pakistani spy master with links to the Taliban claims that
al Qaida has captured American prisoners in eastern Afghanistan, forcing
U.S. troops to end the siege of their stronghold and withdraw. U.S.
officials have denied the claim.
[The complete article]
US hawks unleash public opinion war
Jim Lobe, Asia Times, March 14, 2002
A group of influential neo-conservative figures has launched a new
campaign to sustain support for President George W Bush's war on
terrorism and to "take to task those groups and individuals who
fundamentally misunderstand the nature of the war we are facing".
[The complete article]
COMMENT - If you have doubts about the goals of the so-called "war on terrorism", Americans for Victory Over Terrorism, want set you straight. Check out their web site!
Are the occupied protecting the occupier?
Amira Hass, Counterpunch, March 13, 2002
For the Israel Defense Forces and the Israeli government it is
important to speak about fighting, and to give the impression that both
sides are equals, thus burying the fact that most of the Palestinian
dead are civilians or members of the security forces, who, even if they
were armed, stayed out of the fighting. And it is especially important
for the army and government to bury the fact that the IDF in the
territories is an occupying power. Only thanks to its far superior
strength is Israel able to continue controling the lives of three
million Palestinians, guaranteeing the existence of the settlements on
the Palestinians' land.
[The complete article]
If Bush is having 'visions', America must need Arab support for another war
Robert Fisk, The Independent, March 14, 2002
When President George Bush wanted Arab support for the US bombing of
Afghanistan in September, he suddenly announced he had a "vision" of a
Palestinian state. Then it disappeared off his radar screen. Yet now
it's back in a watered-down, US-framed UN resolution that affirms "a
vision of a region where two states, Israel and Palestine, live side by
side..." Could it be that Mr Bush has another war in mind for the
region, that perhaps Vice-President Dick Cheney, now touring the Arab
world and Israel, wants Arab support for an attack on Iraq?
[The complete article]
America is not a hamburger
President Bush's attempts to rebrand the United States are doomed
Naomi Klein, The Guardian, March 14, 2002
Charlotte Beers, undersecretary of state for public diplomacy and
public affairs, views the US tattered international image as little more
than a communications problem. Somehow America still hasn't managed, in
Beers' words, to "get out there and tell our story". In fact, the
problem is just the opposite: America's marketing of itself has been too
effective. Schoolchildren can recite its claims to democracy, liberty
and equal opportunity as readily as they can associate McDonald's with
family fun and Nike with athletic prowess. And they expect the US to
live up to its claims.
[The complete article]
A return to interventionism
Tom Barry, Asia Times, March 14, 2002
Remember when the US government suffered from the "Vietnam
syndrome"? It hit hard back in the 1970s. That was when the US Congress,
led by liberal Democrats, began taking a closer look at the prevailing
US counterinsurgency and national-security state policies - the type of
US foreign-policy mindset that drove the United States to support
dictators, puppets, and repressive security apparatuses around the
world.
[The complete article]
Realities intrude on Bush's war plans
Julian Borger, The Guardian, March 13, 2002
Two middle-aged Americans are flying off to the Middle East this
week to try to fix some old problems gnawing away at United States
foreign policy. One of them, Anthony Zinni, is an old soldier with peace
proposals in his baggage. The other, Dick Cheney, is a civilian
carrying plans for war. The Bush administration would have you believe
that their parallel journeys have nothing to do with each other, but
they are in fact closely entwined.
[The complete article]
Wedded to another war
Jonathan Freedland, The Guardian, March 13, 2002
Winning public approval for a new assault on Iraq is not Bush's
headache. It is international backing that is more tricky. Hence the
backdrop of 179 national flags at Monday's White House address, hence
the mention of the 16 partners who helped take on the Taliban, hence the
speech's final line, "May God bless our coalition." Hence, too, the
vice-president's current 11-nation tour. This sudden shift to
multilateralism has come late; six weeks ago the administration was in
full "axis of evil" mode, ready to take on the world alone.
[The complete article]
Seven minutes to midnight - the Doomsday Clock moves forward
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
Chicago, February 27, 2002: Today, the Board of Directors of the
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists moves the minute hand of the “Doomsday
Clock,” the symbol of nuclear danger, from nine to seven minutes to
midnight, the same setting at which the clock debuted 55 years ago.
Since the end of the Cold War in 1991, this is the third time the hand
has moved forward.
[The complete article]
Arabs don't want war on Iraq. They want America to change its policy
Robert Fisk, The Independent, March 13, 2002
Mr Cheney's mission appears in the Middle East to be more a symptom
of Washington's myopia than any long-term US strategy. "They already
have one war on their hands out here," one Lebanese commentator said.
"Why do the Americans need another?"
[The complete article]
The fallout of desperation
Robert Scheer, Los Angeles Times, March 12 2002
When in doubt, nuke 'em. The news that the Pentagon had secret
contingency plans to fight terrorism with nuclear weapons has the marks
not of considered military doctrine but rather of an infantile tantrum
born of the Bush administration's frustration in making good on its
overblown promise to end the terrorist scourge. There is desperation in
the air; the giant that is America feels humbled by the Lilliputian
terrorists who have not been brought fully to account.
[The complete article]
America as nuclear rogue
Editorial, New York Times (via Common Dreams), March 12, 2002
If another country were planning to develop a new nuclear weapon and
contemplating pre-emptive strikes against a list of non-nuclear powers,
Washington would rightly label that nation a dangerous rogue state. Yet
such is the course recommended to President Bush by a new Pentagon
planning paper that became public last weekend. Mr. Bush needs to send
that document back to its authors and ask for a new version less
menacing to the security of future American generations.
[The complete article]
America as Sparta
James Carroll, Boston Globe, March 12, 2002
When did Athens become Sparta? When did America redefine itself so
profoundly around war? Events of this winter had already prompted the
question, but then over the weekend The Los Angeles Times published the
stunning news of the Pentagon's Nuclear Posture Review. Reversing a
longtime trend away from nuclear dependence, our government is
projecting a US military strategy based on usable nukes, with
unprecedented potential for first use against nonnuclear states, for
development of new nuclear weapons, and even for a resumption of nuclear
testing. This is a move from Mutual Assured Destruction, as The New
York Times put it, to Unilateral Assured Destruction - our enemy's.
Washington has invited Dr. Strangelove back.
[The complete article]
A premature declaration of victory
Six months on, the case against the war is continuing to gain ground
Jonathan Steele, The Guardian, March 12, 2002
It has taken six months, but the first dissent has appeared in America's mood of bipartisan chauvinism.
[The complete article]
The anthrax culprit
Nicholas Lemann, The New Yorker, March 11, 2002
Barbara Hatch Rosenberg, a slight woman with short graying hair and
deeply concerned hazel eyes, who works out of a small office at the
State University of New York at Purchase, thinks she knows who was
responsible for the anthrax attacks last October. Rosenberg is, to use
the technical term, not chopped liver: she is a veteran molecular
biologist and one of the world's leading experts on biological weapons.
In 1998, she was one of a group of seven scientists who were invited to
the White House to brief President Clinton on the subject. Yet her
theory sounds like the plot of a conspiracy thriller, which is not
usually true of experts' theories, especially on matters this grave.
[The complete article]
Analysis of the anthrax attacks
Barbara Hatch Rosenberg, Federation of American Scientists
Is the FBI Dragging Its Feet?
National Review's editor suggests nuking Mecca
Jerremy Lott, The American Prospect, March 11, 2002
Recently on National Review's new Web log, "The Corner,"
editor Rich Lowry addressed the question of what sort of retaliatory
measures should be taken in the case of a nuclear detonation -- probably
of a "dirty bomb" -- on U.S. soil. Judging from the e-mail he's
received, there's "lots of sentiment for nuking Mecca." Nor, in Lowry's
eyes, was such an idea nuts. He allowed that "Mecca seems extreme, of
course" -- of course -- "but then again few people would die and it would send a signal."
[The complete article]
Itchy fingers on the trigger
Richard Norton-Taylor, The Guardian, March 12, 2002
US military planners and nuclear scientists developed new types of
tactical nuclear bombs during the Clinton administration. In particular
they designed the low-yield B61-11 bomb designed to penetrate
underground bunkers, which have been deployed in Europe since 1997.
Advocates of the use of such small nuclear weapons claim their
environmental impact would be limited. Yet the Washington-based Project
of Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR) says that an attack on
Saddam Hussein's presidential bunker in Baghdad with a B61-11 bomb
"could cause upwards of 20,000 deaths".
[The complete article]
US sends suspects to face torture
Duncan Campbell, The Guardian, March 12, 2002
The US has been secretly sending prisoners suspected of al-Qaida
connections to countries where torture during interrogation is legal,
according to US diplomatic and intelligence sources. Prisoners moved to
such countries as Egypt and Jordan can be subjected to torture and
threats to their families to extract information sought by the US in the
wake of the September 11 attacks.
[The complete article]
Nuclear arms for deterrence or fighting?
Michael R Gordon, New York Times, March 11, 2002
The Pentagon's new blueprint on nuclear forces has raised the
question whether the Bush administration is lowering the threshold for
using nuclear arms. [...] But the classified Pentagon review has ignited
a new and vitally important nuclear debate. Unlike much of the
arms-control discussions in recent years, this dispute is not over the
number of weapons the United States needs; it is over the more
fundamental issue of the circumstances in which they might be used.
[The complete article - registration required]
FOOD FOR HAWKS: An occasional series on current thinking inside the Wolfowitz cabal
COMMENT - The following article is based on a talk by Charles Moore, editor of the Daily Telegraph of London, delivered to the Defense Policy Board. The DPB is chaired by The Prince of Darkness,
Richard Perle, and its members include former Secretary of State, Henry
Kissinger, former Secretary of State, George Shultz, former House
Speaker, Newt Gingrich, former House Speaker, Thomas Foley, former CIA
Director, James Woolsey, former National Security Adviser, Richard
Allen, former Secretary of Defense, Harold Brown, former Vice
President, Dan Quayle, and former Defense and Energy Secretary, James R.
Schlesinger.
Given his highly influential audience, it's particularly noteworthy
to witness the ease with which three themes - European criticism of US
foreign policy, anti-Americanism, and the enemies of America - are
linked together in Moore's closing remarks. He likens the influence of
America's European critics to the influence of the madrassas in Pakistan, where the first seeds of hatred were sown that resulted in the September 11 attacks.
Continental Drift: How to combat Europe's toothless anti-Americanism
Charles Moore, Wall Street Journal March 10, 2002
Ever since President Bush's "axis of evil" speech, Europeans have been fuming over what they see as U.S. war-mongering.
[The complete article]
PERLES OF WISDOM - The broader goals of the "war on terrorism" were neatly summed up by Richard Perle himself, in his New York Times op/ed last December, "The U.S. Must Strike at Saddam Hussein."
Perle's number one reason for advocating on attack on Iraq is because
"Saddam Hussein hates the United States." In Perle's mind (and the
minds of those who seek his counsel) will it be possible to destroy
America's enemies without also silencing its critics?
Educating Mr Cheney
Home truths from abroad
Leader, The Guardian, March 11, 2002
Dick Cheney, the US vice-president, does not get out much. This is
not so much a function of his recurring heart problems, more a
precaution arising from the September 11 attacks. In fact, since the
Bush administration launched its "war against terrorism", Mr Cheney has
eschewed foreign travel and kept well away from the limelight, staying
either at his Washington residence or at various undisclosed and
much-derided "secure locations". As George Bush quipped at the annual
Gridiron white-tie dinner at the weekend, "a year ago Dick was running
the country ... today, he lives out of a little suitcase".
[The complete article]
America's long shadow
Six months after September 11, it is no longer Islamist terror we are afraid of but the US nuclear hitlist
Madeleine Bunting, The Guardian, March 11, 2002
It is six months to the day that Mohammed Atta stepped on to the
Boston-LA flight that destroyed the World Trade Centre. The anniversary
provides a deceptively neat sense of the conclusion of chapter one of
America's response - the grief, the memorials, the celebration of
heroism, the coalition building, the rooting out of the Taliban - and
the beginning of chapter two. But be warned: if there were themes in
chapter one you didn't much like, the latter will be very much worse,
already characterised by determined vengefulness and unbridled
opportunism: "Hey, had an enemy pre-September 11? Now's your chance to
nuke them."
[The complete article]
The spiral of war
Paul Rogers, Open Democracy, March 7, 2002
The desperate violence between Israel and Palestine is intensifying.
Resurgent Taliban fighters have taken a heavy toll of US forces in
Afghanistan. Strains in US bipartisanship offer a sliver of light, but
where is politics amidst the expanding military drive?
[The complete article]
Roots of terror: suicide, martyrdom, self-redemption and Islam
Navid Kermani, Open Democracy, February 21, 2002
After 11 September 2001 I was frequently asked, as many scholars of
Islamic studies probably were, why certain people are prepared to hijack
an aeroplane and plunge themselves and all the other passengers to
certain death. I do not have an answer. What I have done instead is to
tell three stories – about the cult of martyrdom in Shi’ite Islam, about
modern fantasies of salvation through self-sacrifice, and about power
politics in the Middle East – which together assemble the elements of a
fourth : the unfinished story of the modern world.
[The complete article]
Civil liberties take back seat to safety
Henry Weinstein, Daren Briscoe and Mitchell Landsberg, Los Angeles Times, March 10, 2002
Omar Mohamed spent six months in the United States, a time that
seemed divided between two countries. For the first three months, the
19-year-old Egyptian explored the America of his dreams: the Empire
State Building, the casinos of Atlantic City, N.J., even the "dollar
menu" at McDonald's. "It was beautiful," Mohamed said in accented but
proper English. The next three months he spent behind bars at the Hudson
County Jail in Kearny, N.J. By the time he was deported Dec. 14, he had
come to a new understanding of the United States. "It's beautiful," he
said, "for Americans only."
[The complete article]
|
|
HOME
September 11 and the declaration of a "war on terrorism," has
forced Americans to look at the World in a new light. No one can afford
any longer to define the limits of their concerns by refusing to look
beyond this nation's borders. If the freedom that every American
cherishes, is not to become a freedom bound within a fortress, then
every American will need to understand and respect the needs and
concerns of the rest of the World. To this end, The War in Context
invites anyone with interest and an open mind to listen to the critical
discourse in which the policies and actions of the Bush administration
are now being questioned. This debate, which is engaging inquiring minds
inside and outside America, will hopefully inform the development of a
sustainable new world order - a world order in which America is as much
shaped by the World as is the World shaped by America.
|
|
|
