Since the June 7 Lebanese parliamentary elections, an alluring but simplistic narrative has emerged in the West: because Hezbollah and its allies were defeated at the polls, the militant group would lose some of its luster and a pro-American political coalition would rule Lebanon. In fact, Hezbollah remains the country’s dominant military and political force. Moreover, it holds the key to both domestic and external stability — its actions will determine whether there is another war with Israel or if Lebanon will once again be wracked by internal conflict. By losing the election, Hezbollah also avoided being held accountable by Lebanon’s other sects — without power, there is little responsibility. [continued...]
How Hezbollah wins by losing
by Paul Woodward on September 17, 2009
Follow WiC
Subscribe By Email
War in Context…
News and analysis with comments and commentary by Paul Woodward.
This site depends on reader support. If you value the information you find here, please consider offering a donation or becoming a paying subscriber:
(Find out more here.)Site Search
Custom Search-
Recent Posts
Blogroll
- +972 Magazine
- Abu Muqawama
- All Things Counter Terrorism
- ArmsControlWonk
- Bitter Lemons
- Conflicts Forum
- Counterpunch
- Dahr Jamail
- Danger Room
- Democracy Arsenal
- Electronic Intifada
- FP Passport
- Friday Lunch Club
- Glenn Greenwald
- Informed Comment
- Informed Comment: Global Affairs
- Islamophobia Watch
- John Robertson
- Joseph Dana
- Just World News
- KABOBfest
- Lawrence of Cyberia
- LobeLog
- LoonWatch
- Marc Lynch
- Mediagazer
- Memeorandum
- MidEast Brief
- Mondoweiss
- MuzzleWatch
- Palestine Blogs
- Promised Land
- Ramallah Café
- Real News
- Scholars and Rogues
- Syria Comment
- The Agonist
- The Angry Arab
- The Arabist
- The Magnes Zionist
- The Shadowland Journal
- Tikun Olam
- TomDispatch
Archives
Past Archives
Categories
Meta
