Tree that sparked deadly border clash on Israeli side, says UN

My reference yesterday to an Israeli soldier having been on the Lebanese side of the Israel-Lebanon border turns out to have been incorrect.

The Guardian reports:

The tree that sparked a deadly confrontation between Israeli and Lebanese troops along the tense border between the two countries was on Israeli territory, the UN has said.

Five people died in the most serious clash between the two countries since the war of 2006.

Unifil, the UN force that has monitored the border since the ceasefire that ended that conflict, said that investigations had established that the tree, which Israeli troops were cutting down when Lebanese forces fired on them, was south of the “blue line” which marks the border.

“Following the exchange of fire between the Lebanese army and the Israeli army across the blue line in El Adeisse, the Unifil investigators were on the ground and commenced investigations,” it said. “The investigations are still ongoing and the findings will be intimated on [their] conclusion.

“Unifil established, however, that the trees being cut by the Israeli army are located south of the blue line on the Israeli side.”

Unifil confirmed that Israel had notified it of its intention to carry out routine maintenance work on trees along the border, and that Unifil passed the information on to the Lebanese army.

The Lebanese army admitted that its soldiers opened fire on troops from the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) in the confrontation.

In a statement issued to the news agency AFP, a spokesman said: “The Lebanese army opened fire first at Israeli soldiers who entered Lebanese territory… This constituted defence of our sovereignty and is an absolute right.”

An Israeli battalion commander was shot dead and another officer seriously wounded. In Israeli shelling that followed, three Lebanese soldiers and a Lebanese journalist were killed.

The IDF claimed that its forces were the subject of a planned ambush, citing the presence of Lebanese media close to the border. “We have reason to believe this was planned in advance,” an IDF spokeswoman, Avital Leibovich, said. She added that the initiative could have come from Lebanese army units under the influence of the Islamist militant organisation Hezbollah.

Most analysts agreed that the incident was likely to be contained rather than flaring into an ongoing conflict along the tense border.

The dead Israeli soldier, Lieutenant Colonel Dov Harari, a 45-year-old father of four, was to be buried in the coastal city of Netanya later today.

Meanwhile, a Palestinian militant was killed in an air strike in Gaza early today. Sharif Abdel Hadi Abbey, 22, died and two others were injured in the strike close to Khan Younis, according to Palestinian souces. The IDF said aircraft had fired at Palestinians approaching the Gaza border fence.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

3 thoughts on “Tree that sparked deadly border clash on Israeli side, says UN

  1. Boycott Israel Today

    I am not surprised that when Israel is confident that an investigation will be in favour of them its done immediately almost over-night. When an investigation is not favour Israel its is dragged on for years and decades by which the whole world has moved on.

    Can anyone explain to me why this incident was investigated so quickly and previous incidents such as Gaza Freedom Flotilla have not yet had any sort of investigation started?

  2. Colm O' Toole

    “My reference yesterday to an Israeli soldier having been on the Lebanese side of the Israel-Lebanon border turns out to have been incorrect.”

    Seems that he was on the other side of the security fence, which is a chain-link (electrified) fence Israel installed a few yards back from the “blue line” border. Of course the problem with the whole border is that there is no final settlement on an official border. The Blue Line Border was drawn in 2000 by the UN and was based on the border between British mandate Palestine and French Mandate Lebanon. However the UN said when drawing the border that it just marks the point that Israel will withdraw from and not an official national border (which still needed to be drawn by Israel-Lebanon.)

    Also the fact is that since there are no blue line border markers many just use the Israeli security fence as the marker for where Israel ends Lebanon begins.

    Was Israel on its side of the Blue Line border? Yes.
    Did it slightly pass over the security fence? Yes.
    What is the difference between the two? Only a few metres/yards.

    Also technically UNIFIL is responsible for maintaining the Blue Line Israel should have just got them to cut down the tree if it was blocking there view.

  3. omop

    “WAR IN CONTEXT” can do its readers/subscribers an unforgetable favor in publishing the “original” UN map delineating the boundaries of both Israel/Palestine AND the present
    territories “inside” Israel.

    Given the Zionist/Israeli/American fundamentalist presumptions …Israel’s territories as ordained several centuries ago, are limited by historical religious pronouncements that needless to state do not comply with UN limitations.

    Farcically speaking, Jordan, Lebanon and parts of Syria and Egypt are interpreted to be within the territorial imperative of Greater Israel. So any time an Israeli jet flies its daily incursion over Lebanon its actually flying in Israeli air space. No?

Comments are closed.