Noam Chomsky writes:
‘The Arab world is on fire,” al-Jazeera reported last week, while throughout the region, western allies “are quickly losing their influence”. The shock wave was set in motion by the dramatic uprising in Tunisia that drove out a western-backed dictator, with reverberations especially in Egypt, where demonstrators overwhelmed a dictator’s brutal police.
Observers compared it to the toppling of Russian domains in 1989, but there are important differences. Crucially, no Mikhail Gorbachev exists among the great powers that support the Arab dictators. Rather, Washington and its allies keep to the well-established principle that democracy is acceptable only insofar as it conforms to strategic and economic objectives: fine in enemy territory (up to a point), but not in our backyard, please, unless properly tamed.
One 1989 comparison has some validity: Romania, where Washington maintained its support for Nicolae Ceausescu, the most vicious of the east European dictators, until the allegiance became untenable. Then Washington hailed his overthrow while the past was erased. That is a standard pattern: Ferdinand Marcos, Jean-Claude Duvalier, Chun Doo-hwan, Suharto and many other useful gangsters. It may be under way in the case of Hosni Mubarak, along with routine efforts to try to ensure a successor regime will not veer far from the approved path. The current hope appears to be Mubarak loyalist General Omar Suleiman, just named Egypt’s vice-president. Suleiman, the longtime head of the intelligence services, is despised by the rebelling public almost as much as the dictator himself.
RE: “Suleiman, the longtime head of the intelligence services, is despised by the rebelling public almost as much as the dictator himself.” – Chomsky
MY COMMENT: Mubarak loyalist General Omar Suleiman is America’s surrogate “torture master” in Cairo!
If past history is any indication, the U.S. will clumsily plod along, as it usually does in these cases, but it won’t be pretty.
Leslie Gelb, President Emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations, has been at the forefront of those sounding the alarm over ascendance of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. Here’s why “We know their track record on foreign policy,” Gelb says. “It will be much more independent of the U.S. — in many cases, contrary to U.S. foreign policy. There’s no question about that whatsoever, and that’s very important.”