John Tirman writes:
The anniversary of the 9/11 attacks has, predictably, loosed a torrent of sentimental accounts of that terrible day ten years ago.
They recall the shock and horror at these unprecedented events, the courage of the firefighters, the sadness of the victims’ families, and the traumatic impact to the nation. All of this is understandable. What is missing in this retelling, however, are the consequences for America—the enormous cost of “homeland security”—and for the populations of Iraq and Afghanistan who have borne the brunt of America’s vengeance.
For those populations, the penalty is severe. Both countries are still buffeted by chronic warfare that was spurred by U.S. interventions. However one reckons the justifications for the invasions and occupations, the wreckage is undeniable. In Iraq, the number of people killed since the 2003 invasion is well into in the hundreds of thousands, and some four million or more Iraqis have been displaced from their homes. In Afghanistan, the violence has taken a lower toll, but is still in the tens of thousands with no end in sight. For both countries, the living conditions remain difficult—health, clean water, education, livelihoods, and social peace far from adequate.
Those grisly outcomes are occasionally acknowledged in American political discourse, although the costs of war are almost always calibrated in American lives lost and money squandered. The “blood and treasure” calculus rarely mentions the local populations, of course, but even the cost to Americans is sobering: 6,000 lives, tens of thousands maimed, and $4 trillion expended. That $4 trillion does not include vastly expanded Pentagon spending in addition to the wars, spending that has gotten a free pass in the last decade. But another cost is scarcely discussed: the enormous and expanding homeland security juggernaut.
The post-9/11 atmosphere spawned a government and societal response that uses fear and suspicion as a guiding belief system. The government has spent colossal amounts of money and has spurred the private sector to do likewise to check every person entering a skyscraper, scrutinize trillions of emails and phone messages, and expand the “security envelope” of the United States around the world. In dollars, that translates into something like $1 trillion spent by the federal government and probably a similar amount by businesses, educational institutions, and local governments. (Tellingly, there is no estimate of these non-federal costs.) Homeland security, in fact, feeds on the anxieties spawned by 9/11 and nurtured by politicians, in part because it supports pork-barrel politics in the same way that anti-communist fervor fueled excessive military spending and domestic surveillance during the long rivalry with the Soviet Union.
Related Posts...
- A constructive response to 9/11: survivors create worker-owned restaurants
- Insiders voice doubts about CIA’s 9/11 story
- 9/11: the tapping point
- After September 11: our state of exception
- Some real shock and awe: racially profiled and cuffed in Detroit
- The war on terror is corrupting all it touches
- Blair Inc’s ‘baffling’ increase in earnings
- U.S. no longer able to disregard Pakistan’s sovereignty
- The nationally coordinated crackdown on the Occupy movement
- Socialism for the rich, capitalism for the poor
- Video: Bollywood star in U.S. ‘racial profiling’ row
- Homeland Security kept tabs on Occupy Wall Street
- Tourists visiting the U.S. advised not to use figurative language
- DHS pumping money into drones for domestic surveillance, hunting immigrants and seizing pot
- Does airport security really make us safer?
Related Posts...
Related Posts...
Previous post: US detention post-9/11: Birth of a debacle
Next post: The mysterious raid on Eilat: why no one wants to dig too deep

{ 2 comments }
here we are! Who is afraid of Virginia Wolf? Not me!
With the economy sinking, every shyster with security clearance is loosening the Gov’s pocket, dis-inhibiting imbecility through fear. Prof John Muller, for a decade has been a lonely voice of reason in an academic industry of totally useless PhDs who think they can sell their souls for $100,000/yr + tenure by whoring to security “entrepreneurs”– French for the “TAKER” in the middle. There go our “Cold War dividends” funding yet another fraud after Wall Street fraud took nearly $1 trillion from us to make up for it being “too big to fail.” It is often forgotten that one of our biggest and most expensive provider for this “terror” hasbara is Israel. The KILLING INDUSTRY is its only real national industry and we are that shyster’s biggest and dumbest sucker. binLaden must be laughing from the bottom of the Indian Ocean at how our “ally” is finishing off the economic exsanguination of America he tried to start. Is there a limit to what Obama will spend tax-$ on for campaign contributions in return?