9/11 trial poses unparalleled legal obstacles
How do you defend one of the most notorious terrorist figures in history?
One step, legal analysts say, may be to ask for a change of venue.
Khalid Shaikh Mohammed’s lawyers, whoever they are, will no doubt question whether he can get a fair trial from a jury sitting, as Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. noted, in a Manhattan courthouse “just blocks away from where the Twin Towers once stood.”
Then will come the inevitable challenges to interrogation methods used on Mr. Mohammed during more than six years in detention. The government has acknowledged waterboarding him 183 times to extract information about the Sept. 11 attacks, which he eventually admitted planning.
Finally, if Mr. Mohammed is convicted, defense lawyers will most likely plead for jurors in New York, historically more cautious about capital punishment than much of the rest of country, to spare the sentence of execution and send him to prison for the rest of his life instead. [continued...]
Related Posts...
- A constructive response to 9/11: survivors create worker-owned restaurants
- Insiders voice doubts about CIA’s 9/11 story
- 9/11: the tapping point
- After September 11: our state of exception
- Some real shock and awe: racially profiled and cuffed in Detroit
- The poetry of al Qaeda and the Taliban
- The Saudis and al Qaeda
- Iran and al Qaeda: more enemies than allies
- Al-Qaida’s wretched utopia and the battle for hearts and minds
- Pakistani death squads go after informants to U.S. drone program
- FBI quietly forms secretive Net-surveillance unit
- How FBI entrapment is inventing ‘terrorists’ – and letting bad guys off the hook
- FBI: We need wiretap-ready websites — now
- How the FBI spent a decade hunting white supremacists and missed Timothy McVeigh
- Welcome to Incarceration America
Related Posts...
Related Posts...
Related Posts...
Previous post: Newly-released Taliban video of the battle of Wanat
Next post: Why the neocons turned against the Iranian opposition
