Keeping up the war effort

What’s the key to making sure the US “prevails” in Afghanistan? Making sure that American taxpayers remain sufficiently ignorant and indifferent about what’s happening over there.

The news that US soldiers apparently gouged bullets out of the bodies of pregnant women will likely be yet another story that does little to interrupt the torpor of America’s war consciousness.

The Times reports:

US special forces soldiers dug bullets out of their victims’ bodies in the bloody aftermath of a botched night raid, then washed the wounds with alcohol before lying to their superiors about what happened, Afghan investigators have told The Times.

Two pregnant women, a teenage girl, a police officer and his brother were shot on February 12 when US and Afghan special forces stormed their home in Khataba village, outside Gardez in eastern Afghanistan. The precise composition of the force has never been made public.

The claims were made as Nato admitted responsibility for all the deaths for the first time last night. It had initially claimed that the women had been dead for several hours when the assault force discovered their bodies.

In an excellent analysis of US media coverage of the February killings, Glenn Greenwald notes:

What is clear — yet again — is how completely misinformed and propagandized Americans continue to be by the American media, which constantly “reports” on crucial events in Afghanistan by doing nothing more than mindlessly and unquestioningly passing along U.S. government claims as though they are fact.

Jerome Starkey — who managed to penetrate the propaganda veil by doing what reporters of a bygone era understood to be their job: independently gathering information as opposed to transcribing official statements — writes at Nieman Watchdog:

The only way I found out NATO had lied — deliberately or otherwise — was because I went to the scene of the raid, in Paktia province, and spent three days interviewing the survivors. In Afghanistan that is quite unusual.

NATO is rarely called to account. Their version of events, usually originating from the soldiers involved, is rarely seriously challenged.

This particular raid, in the early hours of Feb 12, piqued my interest. I contacted some of the relatives by phone, established it was probably safe enough to visit, and I finally made it to the scene almost a month after unidentified gunmen stormed the remnants of an all-night family party.

It’s not the first time I’ve found NATO lying, but this is perhaps the most harrowing instance, and every time I go through the same gamut of emotions. I am shocked and appalled that brave men in uniform misrepresent events. Then I feel naïve.

There are a handful of truly fearless reporters in Afghanistan constantly trying to break the military’s monopoly on access to the front. But far too many of our colleagues accept the spin-laden press releases churned out of the Kabul headquarters. Suicide bombers are “cowards,” NATO attacks on civilians are “tragic accidents,” intelligence is foolproof and only militants get arrested.

Some journalists in Kabul are hamstrung by security rules set in Europe or America, which often reflect the least permissive times in Baghdad rather than any realistic threats in Afghanistan. These reporters can’t leave their compounds without convoys of armed guards. They couldn’t dream of driving around rural Paktia, dressed up in local clothes and squashed into the back of an old Toyota Corolla, to interview the survivors of a night raid.

Ultra risk-averse organizations go even further and rely almost entirely on video footage and still images gifted by the entirely partial combat-camera teams or the coalition’s dedicated NATO TV unit, staffed by civilian ex-journalists who churn out good news b-roll. Others lap up this material because it’s cheaper and easier than having their own correspondents in a war zone.

This self-censorship is compounded by the “embed culture,” which encourages journalists to visit the frontlines with NATO soldiers, who provide them food, shelter, security and ultimately with stories.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

2 thoughts on “Keeping up the war effort

  1. Norman Morley

    Having just viewed a video of U.S. Troops shooting Iraqi civilians, then reading this post, along with Karzai blabbing his going over to the other side, adds more urgency to my saying that the U.S. needs to pull out of Afghanistan as well as the rest of the Middle East. Since 9-11, this KUBAKI has been nothing more than that, along with draining the treasury of both money & blood. If ever the need for the American People to stand up & yell “enough is enough”, that time is now. The whole area is building up into one big power keg, one that will drag the whole World into W W III. Time to sent all of the War mongers in this country over to the middle east, let them fight the wars, that includes the Congress & the W.H. I believe the Point of no return has passed, unless action is taken soon. The performance that “O” has exhibited since becoming P.O.T.U.S. says either he is incapable or never intended to follow through on his campaign promises, which leans in that direction. Just as Bush is going into the history books for his destructive 8 years in office, so will “O” as the P.O.T.U.S. who presided in the downfall of the country. I can’t envision why any man would want to be in these shows.

  2. DE Teodoru

    How interesting! Gen. McChrystal covers his butt telling the NYTIMES Sunday that we’re killing too many innocents and the next day this story blows up. If you’re not suspiscious yet look up the McChrystal opus Pat Tillman. Here are some more whole body shaking articles.

Comments are closed.