AIPAC bares all to quash Rosen lawsuit

Maybe the days of the Israel lobby are numbered — not because it’s about to fall apart but because the terms of discourse will change. That is, we will no longer be speaking about a “lobby” as such but more explicitly about the evidence that the state of Israel has effectively pulled off a soft coup and through its informal representatives in Washington assumed a controlling influence over significant parts of the US government.

To put the notion of America under Israeli control in perspective, imagine this: if at the height of the Cold War, hundreds of USG officials and political operatives inside Washington were discovered to have sympathies and close ties with the Soviet Union. No greater shock to the American political system would have been seen since the Civil War. The fact that Israel is characterized as a friendly state really does little to diminish the significance of the influence it wields in domestic American politics. No other foreign government enjoys a fraction of Israel’s power in the US.

Grant Smith writes:

On Nov. 8, 2010, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) filed a massive 260-page motion [.pdf] in the District of Columbia Superior Court. It asks Judge Erik Christian to dismiss former AIPAC employee Steven J. Rosen’s $20 million defamation suit. In October the court dismissed all counts of the March 2009 lawsuit except for Rosen’s claim of harm over AIPAC statements to the press that he did not uphold its standards of conduct. Rosen and AIPAC have – until now – abstained from filing damaging information about the internal workings of AIPAC in court. AIPAC’s willingness to publicly air some extremely sordid and revealing content to get the remaining count thrown out before an alternative dispute resolution hearing begins in December is a sign that AIPAC is now fighting for its life, or – as one former AIPAC attorney put it – “reason for being.” If Rosen proves in court that AIPAC has long handled classified information while lobbying for Israel, the worn public pretense that AIPAC is anything but a stealth extension of the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs – from which it emerged in 1951 – will end forever.

Rosen filed his civil suit after adverse judicial rulings made his (and coworker Keith Weissman’s) prosecution under the Espionage Act unlikely. Col. Lawrence Franklin pled guilty to passing classified national defense information to persons not entitled to receive it while Rosen and Weissman were indicted in 2005 for their role in the espionage affair. Although prosecutors reluctantly dropped [.pdf] their indictment in May 2009 – as AIPAC carefully notes in its filing – Rosen was never acquitted. Outstanding questions in the defamation suit about classified-information trafficking have now placed AIPAC in a bind. If AIPAC financially settles with Rosen, it will signal to the American people and attentive law enforcement officials that it is honoring a previous compensation deal to pay Rosen off after the spy flap subsided. On May 11, 2010, Rosen revealed an e-mail to Washington Post reporter Jeff Stein asserting that AIPAC promised “when this is over we will do right by Steve.” But it’s now far from clear whether AIPAC has the financial wherewithal or donors willing to honor such a – possibly illegal – commitment.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

2 thoughts on “AIPAC bares all to quash Rosen lawsuit

  1. Renfro

    A lot of people have (wished for and) pronounced AIPAC dead before…but like a molting snake it sheds one skin and slithers right on.

    It’s gonna take more than lawsuits..something like silver bullets and a wooden stake.

  2. BillVZ

    “Republican House of Representatives, whose leaders are openly pledging allegiance to Israeli PM Binyamin Netanyahu while vowing to undermine the U.S. President in his favor”.
    For a further perspective on that statement a viewing of Mr. Cantor’s speech in East Jerusalem at a past U.S. Thanksgiving Holiday visit should be more than sufficient to solidify where the Republican House leaders are aligned.(Juan -16 Nov-Informed Comment)
    As the reader views this video clip take Paul’s concept that there should no doubt that America is under Israeli control. Having previously seen clips of the U.S. politicians as they spoke their remarks of endearment and support of Israel and AIPAC; I was only slightly shocked at video’s implication to the influence Mr.Cantor wields in domestic and foreign American politics by his fawning words to the hyped up audience.He is just one of many who serve another government.
    Your comment rings so true Paul-no other foreign government enjoys a fraction of Israel’s power in the US. May I add -and no government has such a pliant and uninterested citizenry at the reality and continuation of such a bizarre relationship.

Comments are closed.