New York Times sick of Israel

I have no idea how accurate the reporting is here, but Israel Today Magazine has a colorful account of what it headlines as an Israeli diplomat getting “ambushed” by the New York Times editorial team, under the direction of “rabid columnist” Tom Friedman.

The New York Times, flagship of the liberal American media, has never been a friend of the Jewish state. But the newspaper’s aversion to Israel turned to open hostility this month when its top editors ambushed and tore into an unsuspecting senior official from the Israeli Consulate in New York City.

The Israeli official was invited by the Times editors, among them rabid columnist Thomas Friedman, to meet with them at their office. Being a veteran at dealing with the American media, the official assumed the invitation was for a friendly discussion and perhaps an interview regarding the peace process and other matters of importance to Israel.

The Israeli had no idea he was being invited for what he described as a lynch.

As the meeting started, the Times editors – most of them Jews, and one of them a former Israeli – began to attack the Israeli diplomat, and refused to give him even a moment to respond.

They blamed Israel for everything, the diplomat told Israel Today.

The Times editors insisted the breakdown of the peace process was Israel’s fault, that the lack of peace was Israel’s fault, and were adamant that Israel had given nothing to the Palestinians. They accused Israel of being an extremist and racist state, and blasted the diplomat for Israel’s “ill-treatment” of President Barack Obama.

In short, the Times staff informed the Israeli in no uncertain terms that they were sick of his country.

The diplomat told us he was shocked by the attack. He tried to respond, but the Times editors were not interested in hearing his arguments.

“I asked them,” said the diplomat, “We haven’t given the Palestinians anything? How can you say that? Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu broke with his party platform and implemented a 10-month Jewish building freeze, and what did we get in return? More Palestinian refusal to negotiate.”

According to the Israeli, the Times editors responded: “Yes, yes. Of course you are going to start telling us about how Israel’s security needs are not being met. You just don’t get it that we are sick of hearing about that.”

There is little doubt that this ambush was led by Friedman, whose hostility toward Israel in his recent columns has surprised even his liberal friends in the Jewish state.

In recent articles, Friedman has accused Israel of being a spoiled child, crazy and extremist. He insisted that the US stop being Israel’s “enabler,” and pointed out that the rest of the world is fully on the side of the Palestinians, so why not America?

Wrote Friedman in one of his columns: “Israel, when America – which has given you billions over the past 50 years and defended you in the international arena – asks you to stop building settlements for three months in order to jump start peace talks, there is only one correct answer, and that is ‘yes, whatever you say.’”

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

7 thoughts on “New York Times sick of Israel

  1. Woody

    HAHAHAHAHAHA! Israel Today attempts an immature smear attack on Friedman to punish him for the Israeli Center/Right’s perceived insecurity. The sad thing is that Israel couldn’t ask for a better friend than Friedman, however, morons editing IT will quickly chase their allies into anti-Zionist camps.

    The Palestine struggle is developing so much quicker than South Africa because of the self-destructive flailing of the Zionist disestablishment.

  2. Renfro

    I have always found Freidman mentally ‘lite’ and illogical…if not downright stupid or a liar in some cases.
    I will never forget his column about how Egyptians were ‘celebrating’ the new US imposed rules on their free tade zones exports to the US that required Egypt to use 20% Israeli produced materials in all their cotton exports…part of his touting his Flat Earth theory.
    While Freidman was calling it a celebration all the international papers were showing pictures of rioting by Egyptian workers who were out of jobs in the buttons and bows production that been given to Israel.

  3. pabelmont

    Never mind Friedman. when will we see something like this IN the NYT? The revolutiuon hasn’t happened until you SEE it in NYT. This is a sort of push by Obama think-a-likes, and I wish them well, but they should tell the NYT that it needs to publish this stuff, and explain it to USA Jews so they won’t think their world is coming to an end; publication in Israel Today Magazine is hardly enough.

  4. delia ruhe

    I’ll be interested to see how Friedman responds to this–if he’s smart enough to start identifying with the very long line of people who’ve been smeared into silence by “rabid” Israeli nationalists.

  5. Norman

    Care of those bearing gifts. Lulling people into thinking there could be a change in direction from the U.S. in regards to Israel, will be just another attempt to appease those that have had enough. It does take more than being written up in ab Israeli publication. The spin Israel puts out is always self aggrandizement to their benefit. When as others above have said, it is published here in the U.S. from coast to coast, then perhaps it may hold water, but so fay, the bucket has no bottom.

Comments are closed.