The Anders Behring Breivik interview

Anders Behring Breivik’s attorney, Geir Lippestad, says his client appears to be insane. Whether this is what Lippestad actually believes or whether he is simply laying the groundwork for an insanity defense, is unclear. But the idea that only a madman could do what Breivik did, is an idea with dangerous and popular appeal.

We would all like to believe that normal people are incapable of doing dreadful things. We want to imagine that Breivik is one of a kind.

Those who share Breivik’s antipathy for Islam, who promote the idea that the West is being taken over by Muslims and who warn that Europe and America are in jeopardy of coming under the rule of Sharia law, are now trying to protect their investment in this pernicious ideology by joining in the chorus that Breivik is a psychopath.

“The manifesto of the perpetrator makes clear that this is a madman,” writes Geert Wilders.

Pamela Geller follows the same tack:

Conservative blogger and anti-jihadist Pamela Geller told The Daily Caller it’s “outrageous” that she’s been “assign[ed] blame” for Oslo shooter Anders Behring Breivik’s actions.

“It’s like equating Charles Manson, who heard in the lyrics of Helter Skelter a calling for the Manson murders,” Geller said in an exclusive phone interview. “It’s like blaming the Beatles. It’s patently ridiculous.”

Robert Spencer at Jihad Watch refers to Breivik as the “mad murderer in Norway.”

In each instance, the reason the anti-Jihadists want to characterize Breivik as insane is rather transparent: they want to create the widest possible distance between Breivik and their ideology.

The truth is way too uncomfortable — that Breivik, Wilders, Geller, and Spencer all view the world through the same ideological prism; they merely have a tactical disagreement about the best way of promoting their views.

When Wilders asserts that Breivik’s writings make it clear he’s a madman, Wilders is relying on the fact that most people won’t read Breivik. If they do they will quickly discover how closely aligned he is with his anti-Jihadist detractors.

In his compendium, 2083 A European Declaration of Independence, Breivik interviews himself. There we learn that his extremism is mixed with a large measure of political pragmatism.

Even if neo-Nazis and cultural conservatives (like him) share common ground he sees no chance that they can form an alliance. “It will be extremely hard to cooperate with anyone who views our primary ally (the Jews/Israel) as their primary enemy.”

He sees himself as part of “a relatively cynical/cruel/goal oriented armed resistance group” that nevertheless has “foundational principles” that would appeal to the majority of Europeans.

There are plenty of views expressed here that most people will find offensive, and though the fears that Breivik shares with other anti-Jihadists might be irrational or overblown, there is little evidence he is mad.

Q: Is it possible that cultural conservatives and National Socialists will
cooperate in the future?

A: It will be extremely hard to cooperate with anyone who views our primary ally (the
Jews/Israel) as their primary enemy. Their Jew obsession and support to Islamic regimes
will severely hinder any direct cooperation. They are blinded by their Jew hate to a
degree where they fail to see the imminent threat to Europe represented by Islam.
The following poll was taken from eNationalist, a rather hardcore NS site:

eNat Poll[4]: Can the Arab world and part of the Islamic world be our allies?
Yes: 44%
No: 52%

This poll indirectly illustrate that the hardcore NS community reject the concept of
European Christian solidarity and thus rejecting the support to our Eastern Christian
cousins (Greek, Maronite, Assyrian, Copt) with the long term goal of creating future
Christian (Islamic free) zones. It also shows that they are generally supportive of
alliances with Islamic countries.

It wasn’t exactly a secret that many in the NS movements rejected Christendom
completely and instead support Odinism. It is however understandable that they view
modern humanist Christendom as weak and therefore unworthy of support (a view which
I partly agree with). However, the solution is not to reject Christianity but rather to
reform Christianity to re-introduce the concepts of “self-defence” as propagated by
former Crusader Popes. Also, we shouldn’t forget that Nazi Germany allied itself with the
Ottoman Caliphate/Turkey on two occasions and supported the Christian Armenian
genocides.

Many NS support the Islamic conspiracy theory that Jews organised the 9/11 attacks and
both reject that the Holocaust took place. In light of these opposing views it’s hard to
imagine that the “new Western European right” will be willing to trust National Socialists.

One of the reasons why hardcore anti-Semites (David Duke would be a case in point) are
unreliable allies is that they hate Jews so much that it shuts down the rational parts of their brain and they end up making common cause with Muslims, based on mutual hatred.
Fjordman

However, we have certain things in common that shouldn’t be underestimated.
We share the same anti -EU, -UN and –immigration/multiculturalism (Muslim immigration
at least) sentiments and the goal of “preserving European traditions, culture etc” which is
the primary reason why more and more ex-NS people are conforming and joining the
new “European right”.

As a message to those hardcore NS’s who are simply unable to compromise; Conform
and join our armed struggle against the European cultural Marxists/multiculturalists (the
enablers of the Islamisation of Europe), or continue to be sidelined and marginalised.
Multiculturalism is the hole in the dike. Islam is the water pouring in. Everything else
should be irrelevant. Your “Jew” obsession is undermining your own struggle against
multiculturalism.

The cultural conservatives of Western Europe will seize power by 2080, if you want to be
a part of this you will have no choice but to compromise. I would imagine that a
continued Judeo Christian Europe would be considerably better than a European
Caliphate even for the most hardcore NS.

Q: Some “Ghandist/pacifist” members of the conservative resistance will claim
that violence will not solve anything and will instead only give our enemies
more rhetorical ammunition and make it easier for them to gain the moral
ground. They will finally be able to say; “terrorism has no religion”. “By using
terror you are undermining your own struggle and hurting the nationalist
cause”.

How would you react to statements like this?

A: Well, first of all, I would tell him he obviously didn’t have a clue what he was talking
about. Pacifist approaches have been tried in the past; in Lebanon where the Christians
waited until the Muslims made up 60% of the population. The Copts in Egypt have been
relatively pacifist and look what it got them… They are almost extinct due to their
pacifist stance. The same can be said about the Christian Assyrians and Armenians. They
waited and waited, like loyal little dhimmis and “hoped” for a better future, until the day
the Muslims decided to massacre them. Ghandi pacifism worked against the Brits in India
because Christian Europeans aren’t primitive barbarians… However, pacifism doesn’t
work at all against an Islamic entity. As soon as they become a form a majority (and this
will happen unless we can start the deportation campaigns in time) they will strike and
eventually massacre us as history has shown again and again.

A great majority of the European conservatives have chosen dialogue and pacifism since
1955 until today. And what exactly has it gotten us…? During the last 55 years of pacifist
dialogue, the multiculturalists have been allowed to open the gates and flooded our
ancestral lands with 30 million Muslims and they even continue to do so today. Should
we perhaps try dialogue for another 40 years and see what that brings us…? Only a
suicidal individual would accept this. Not acting would be the biggest of all crimes.
The time for dialogue is over for an increasing number of Western Europeans. The
European civil war will progress the coming decades and our traitor enemies will
eventually be defeated and executed.

Your personal life and convictions
Q: How did you first get involved in your current activities?

A: Well, I gained awareness of certain issues at that time. My best friend for many years,
a Muslim, had lived his whole life in Oslo West with limited contact with the Norwegian-
Pakistani community. Yet, he and more or less 100% of youngsters like him still failed in
many ways to be integrated. He attended Urdu classes at school from early childhood. He
went to the mosque occasionally after he was 12. Like most Norwegian-Pakistanis he felt
really torn between the Norwegian community and the Pakistani community. However, I
was wrong when assuming that he would chose to follow my path and the Norwegian
way. I understood early that he resented Norwegians and the Norwegian society. Not
because he was jealous, after all he could have conformed if he wanted to. He resented it
because it represented the exact opposite of Islamic ways. Shortly after we broke of
contact he left Jon Trygve and Richard and started hanging out with his cousin and other
Pakistanis. Since then he has been a part of the Pakistani community in Oslo and has, as
far as I know, minimal contact with the Norwegian community. Since then he and his
Muslim friends have beaten and harassed several ethnic Norwegians, one of them being
my friend, Kristoffer.

According to Kristoffer, Arsalan and a bunch of Pakistanis tried to rob him (See: Jizya).
When he refused to pay them, they beat him badly. Luckily, there were witnesses around
and this incident in addition to Arsalans other acts of violence against ethnic Norwegians
resulted in him being incarcerated for 6 months. Another incident, which was confirmed
from reliable sources, happened on New Year’s Eve in Frognerparken, Oslo. Arsalan and
his Pakistani friends allegedly gang raped an ethnic Norwegian girl. I believe this was in
95 or 96. As far as I know, they were never charged with this crime due to the lack of
witnesses.

Muslim girls were off limits to everyone, even the Muslim boys. The only available
“commodity” at this point was therefore ethnic Norwegian girls, referred to as “whores”.
Due to the tolerance indoctrinated through Norwegian upbringing – girls aren’t brought
up to be sceptics, racists or anti-immigrant, just like most boys. They are all brought up
to be very tolerant. As a result, many ethnic Norwegian girls, especially in Muslim
dominated areas, despise ethnic Norwegian boys because they consider them as weak
and inferior with lack of pride, seeing as they are systematically “subdued” by the
“superior Muslim boys”. Ironically, Muslim boys are raised to view Norwegian girls as
inferior “whores”. Their only purpose is to bring pleasure until the Muslim guys are
around 20-25 when they will find a pure, “superior” Muslim girl, a virgin. At this point,
the ethnic Norwegian “whores” is discarded, and most of the girls go back to their old
“tribe”. They are welcomed back in the name of tolerance.

More or less all Muslim parents will tell their sons the following: “You can have fun with
the Norwegian whores, as long as you marry a Muslim”. If, against all odds, a Muslim guy
wants to marry one of these “whores”, she has to convert to Islam – no exception. The
Muslim girls however are guarded by their male family members like they were made of
pure gold. If a Muslim girl, against all odds, engages in a relationship with an ethnic
Norwegian guy, then the Muslim males from her family or “tribe” will kill her or forcefully
take her to their country of origin to be “educated” for a few years. They will attempt to
lure her on a vacation to Pakistan, Morocco, Somalia etc. and possibly kill her there, if
she still refuses to conform. An alternative strategy is to forcefully marry her off to a local
Muslim guy and keep her in their country of origin until she is sufficiently “tied down”
through impregnating her and systematical indoctrination. When she is “tied down” with
2 or more children there isn’t much she can do. Also, it’s not very risky to kill Muslim girls
in Muslim countries as most government officials are corrupt and “very understanding”,
especially in cases where a family wants to “restore their pride”. This is the main reason
why Muslim girls are occasionally sent back to their country of origin, in order to prevent
them from becoming too “European”. They are often sent back to Europe, after several
years of abduction and indoctrination when they are sufficiently subdued and under
control of the Muslim society. It’s not very tempting for Muslim girls to file a divorce and
risk getting frozen out of the Muslim community or risk getting killed when they have 2-4
children.

I also remember from my earlier childhood, two Pakistani and one Turkish girl from
Smestad school, the primary school I attended; Baligha, Modazzer and Eilif. Baligha was
Faizals, my friend’s, sister, I didn’t know Modazzer although she was my neighbour, but I
used to play with Eilif, Onors sister. At that time there were three Pakistani families in
that area and one Turkish, all except the latter lived in publicly subsidised apartments, in
accordance with the government’s integration program. I remember the day when
Modazzers chair was empty. We didn’t get an answer from our teacher regarding her
whereabouts. She was supposed to have returned from her summer vacation in Pakistan.
The next year Eilif was sent to Turkey. I heard her father thought she had become “too
Norwegian”. A few years later, the exact same thing happened with Baligha. One day she
didn’t show up for school after her vacation in Pakistan. I was only 10 years old at that
time and didn’t really know what was going on. In retrospect I know that they were sent
back to their country of origin, and no one as far as I know has heard from them again.
They were most likely either married away at young age or killed. I know exactly where
those families live(d) and I know for a fact that they vanished and didn’t return for
several years. At this point I knew nothing about Islam. I only learned at school that
Islam was peaceful and tolerant, very similar to Christianity. I was therefore unable to
make the correct conclusions and identify that both Baligha and Modazzer had in fact
been abducted.

Anyway, back to the topic. When I was around 16-17 years old I joined the Progress
Party Youth organisation (FpU) as they were anti-immigration and pro-free-market. Every
single journalist in the country regarded them as racist because of their anti-immigration
program. FrP were under constant attacks from every single media organisation, NGO’s
and all the other political parties. They were called racists and Nazis and were generally
labelled as “fascist pigs”. FrP appealed to me because I had experienced the hypocrisy in
society first hand and I knew already then that they were the only party who opposed
multiculturalism.

It became obvious to me early on that the hypocrisy in society was so prevalent and
overwhelming. I now started to see the connection between Islam, Western media, the
extreme left and the government. I started studying Islamism, Socialism, egalitarianism
and other directions of Political Science and became more aware of what was going on. I
then, for the first time, understood why I hadn’t learned anything of relevance about
Islam at school, and the motives for suppressing the truth on these issues – political
correctness.

Around year 2000 I realised that the democratic struggle against the Islamisation of
Europe, European multiculturalism was lost. It had gone too far. It is simply not possible
to compete democratically with regimes who import millions of voters. 40 years of
dialogue with the cultural Marxists/multiculturalists had ended up as a disaster. It would
now only take 50-70 years before we, the Europeans are in a minority. As soon as I
realised this I decided to explore alternative forms of opposition. Protesting is saying that
you disagree. Resistance is saying you will put a stop to this. I decided I wanted to join
the resistance movement.

However, the main problem then was that there weren’t any alternatives for me at all.
There weren’t any known armed cultural conservative, or Christian, anti-Jihad
movements.

An NS or racist/anti Jewish movement was completely out of the question, as they
represented much of what I oppose. I came in contact with Serbian cultural conservatives
through the internet. This initial contact would eventually result in my contact with
several key individuals all over Europe and the forming of the group who would later
establish the military order and tribunal, PCCTS, Knights Templar. I remember they did a
complete screening and background check to ensure I was of the desired calibre. Two of
them had reservations against inviting me due to my young age but the leader of the
group insisted on my candidature. According to one of them, they were considering
several hundred individuals throughout Europe for a training course. I met with them for
the first time in London and later on two occasions in Balticum. I had the privilege of
meeting one of the greatest living war heroes of Europe at the time, a Serbian crusader
and war hero who had killed many Muslims in battle. Due to EU persecution for alleged
crimes against Muslims he was living at one point in Liberia. I visited him in Monrovia
once, just before the founding session in London, 2002.

I was the youngest one there, 23 years old at the time. One of the key founders
instructed the rest of the group about several topics related to the goal of the
organisation. I believe I scribbled down more than 50 full pages of notes regarding all
possible related topics. Much of these notes are forwarded in the book 2083. It was
basically a detailed long term plan on how to seize power in Western Europe. I did not
fully comprehend at the time how privileged I was to be in the company of some of the
most brilliant political and military tacticians of Europe. Some of us were unfamiliar with
each other beforehand so I guess we all took a high risk meeting face to face. There were
only 5 people in London re-founding the order and tribunal (1 by proxy) but there were
around 25-30 attending in Balticum during the two sessions, individuals from all over
Europe; Germany, France, Sweden, the UK, Denmark, Balticum, Benelux, Spain, Italy,
Greece, Hungary, Austria, Armenia, Lebanon and Russia. Electronic or telephonic
communication was completely prohibited, before, during and after the meetings. On our
last meeting it was emphasised clearly that we cut off contact indefinitely. Any type of
contact with other cells was strictly prohibited.

This was not sessions were regular combat cells were created. It was more like a training
course for pioneer cell commanders. We were not instructed to attack specific targets,
quite the opposite. We were encouraged to rather use the information distributed to
contribute to build and expand the so called ”cultural conservative anti-Jihad movement,
either through spreading propaganda, provide funding for the creation of new groups
through various forums or by recruiting other people directly. All individuals attending the sessions learned about PCCTS, the Knights Templar but they were not specifically
instructed to represent that particular order and tribunal. Everyone was encouraged but
at the end, it was their own decision how they decided to manifest their resistance. A
special emphasis was put on the long term nature of the struggle (50-100 years). Our
task was to contribute to a long term approach and not to act prematurely. If there was a
large scale attack the next 10 years it was said, we should avoid any immediate follow up
attacks as it would negate the shock effect of the subsequent attacks. A large successful
attack every 5-12 years was optimal depending on available forces.

This was not a stereotypical “right wing” meeting full of underprivileged racist skinheads
with a short temper, but quite the opposite. Most of them were successful entrepreneurs,
business or political leaders, some with families, most of them Christian conservatives
but also some agnostics and even atheists. I remember it struck me how impressed I
was regarding how they had set up the screening parameters (for accepting new
candidates). They obviously wanted resourceful pragmatical individuals who were able to
keep information away from their loved ones and who were not in any way flagged by
their governments. Every one of them was supportive of a Judeo Christian Europe and
did not have any reservations against cooperating with non-European Christians Hindu or
Buddhist nationalists. I had or have a relatively close relationship with at least one of
them, an Englishman, who became my mentor. He was the one who first described the
“perfect knight” and had written the initial fundament for this compendium. I was asked,
not only once but twice, by my mentor; let’s call him Richard, to write a second edition of
his compendium about the new European Knighthood. As such, I spent several years to
create an economic platform which would allow me to study and write a second edition.
And as of now, I have spent more than three years completing this second edition.
Perhaps, someone out there will be able to contribute by creating a third edition one day.

Q: What tipped the scales for you? What single event made you decide you
wanted to continue planning and moving on with the assault?

A: For me, personally, it was my government’s involvement in the attacks on Serbia
(NATO bombings in 1999) several years back. It was completely unacceptable how the
US and Western European regimes bombed our Serbian brothers. All they wanted was to
drive Islam out by deporting the Albanian Muslims back to Albania. When the Albanians
refused, they really didn’t have any choice but to use military force. By disallowing the
Serbians the right for self-determination over their sovereign territory they indirectly dug
a grave for Europe. A future where several Mini-Pakistan’s would eventually will be
created in every Western European capital. This is unacceptable, completely
unacceptable.

There have been several issues that have reaffirmed my beliefs since then. Among them;
my governments cowardly handling of the Muhammad Cartoon issue and their decision to
award the Nobel peace prize to an Islamic terrorist (Arafat) and appeasers of Islam.
There have been tens of other issues. My government and our media capitulated to Islam
several years ago, after the Rushdie event. Since then, it has gone downhill. Thousands
of Muslims pouring in annually through our Asylum institution, or by family reunification.
The situation is just chaotic. These suicidal traitors must be stopped.

Q: How did you proceed after these sessions in 2002-2004?

A: I understood early that in order to be able to work full time with what you want, you
need to gain economical independence. I was not rich at the time and I had to somehow
find a way to earn enough funds to be able to contribute.

Late in 2002 I was working full time as a mid level leader in a customer service company.
At the same time, I started a company that focused on outsourcing of programming
services. It went quite well. And around May 2003 I quit my day job to focus entirely on
my business. The next three years i worked an average 12 hours per day with my
company; E-Commerce Group. At one point I had 6 employees, 2 in Norway, 2 in Russia,
1 in Romania and one in Indonesia. I registered an off shore company and several off
shore bank accounts in order to avoid excessive state taxation (anonymous debit cards
and ATM`s ftw). This way, I could build up funds faster. My initial plan was to earn at
least 5 million, then use the acquired funds to start a pan-European conservative
movement or plan an advanced operation. It started out great and I earned my first mill
(NOK) at the age of 24 which peaked at 4 million, 12 months later. In 2005 and 2006,
recession hit my industry which resulted in lower income margins. As a result I decided
to discontinue my company and instead salvage all the funds I could. The most cost
efficient way of doing this in my country is to file for bankruptcy, which I did. I had now
completed my goal and I had enough funding to proceed with planning of an assault
operation.

I spent three years were I focused on writing the compendium, 2083. During a 12 month
period in the beginning, I also played World of Warcraft part time (which had been a
dream for some time – hardcore raiding:). I lived very ascetic and relatively isolated in
this period. These three years would also contribute to detach myself from my “old life”.
It’s a process I used in order to isolate myself from most of my network, in preparation
for the coming operation. I feel that this period was needed in order to completely
”detach myself from “the game”, my “former shallow consumerist lifestyle ” in order to
ensure full focus on the matters at hand.

Comment: Normally I find it quite pathetic to brag about how much one has earned. The
only reason I mentioned it is because the cultural Marxist/ multiculturalist government
will likely try to attempt to “assassinate my character” by labelling me as an “insane,
inbred, pedophile Nazi loser”.

I guess it should also be noted that I did in fact lose 2 million NOK on stock speculation
during the period 2005-2008 leaving me with approximately 2 million (half a million went
to tax). Most of my funds were channelled through the company; Brentwood Solutions
Ltd (and four other offshore accounts) which again channelled the funds to my
Norwegian corporation; E-Commerce Group AS and to anonymous debit cards. Despite
the fact that I used an offshore company/accounts. In retrospect I see that I made
certain mistakes which has pressured my budget. I had approximately one million NOK
(170 000 Euro) to spend on both writing the book and finance the operation. I spent
more funds during the creation of the compendium leaving me with approximately
40 000 Euro plus credit for the operation.

Q: Why did you choose an allegiance to a group with Christian values and pan-
European goals instead of a purely national/regional group?

A: Many have asked this question. My choice has nothing to do with the fact that I am
not proud of my own traditions and heritage. My choice was based purely pragmatism.
All Europeans are in this boat together so we must choose a more moderate platform
that can appeal to a great number of Europeans – preferably up to 50% (realistically up
to 35%). Choosing a local/national group would be counterproductive as all the groups I
am familiar with are Odinist orientated and not Christian identity groups. It is essential
that we choose a banner that has the potential to appeal towards central and southern
Europeans as well. I understand that many nationalists oppose Christianity and do not
wish to fight under the banner of a cross. Furthermore, I understand that many
nationalists only care for their own nation and culture. However, all Western Europeans
are in the same situation, facing the same problems so it would be illogical not to
cooperate and focus on pan-European organizations. Pooling resources and especially
knowledge is essential. Obviously, this cannot be achieved if you require that your
potential members follow un-appealing principles and codes such as that of the national
anarchists (at least many of them). A hateful ideology (white supremacist), death metal,
Odinism, conspiracy theories does NOT have mass appeal. Some of the local nationalist
factions have very controversial views and lifestyles that do not appeal to a broad specter
of people. This is in a way understandable as it can be viewed as indirect cultural
defensive mechanisms as a result of decades of persecution from local authorities. Yet, so
called national anarchists will never be potent enough unless they pool their knowledge
base with pan-European organisations. Mass appeal should be the most essential factor
in this strategy. Obviously, the PCCTS, Knights Templar does not have mass appeal as we
are a relatively cynical/cruel/goal oriented armed resistance group. However, our
primary foundational principles (a majority of them) still have mass appeal and are
supported by as many as 50-60% of all Europeans. The reason for this is due to the fact
that we oppose ALL hate ideologies and we consider it illogical to fight hate with hate. Of
course, this does not mean that we will use less brutal methods in our operations. It only
means that our foundational ideological principles will have mass appeal to a majority of
Europeans.

In comparison, the foundational principles of National Socialism or white supremacy
groups in general does not have mass appeal and is supported by less than 10%, in
many countries less than 5%.

And yes, we are aware that many NS will view us as sellouts and even traitors. Many
believe that we are race traitors for offering any non-Muslim minority group the
opportunity to fight with us and for flagging support to Zionism (Israeli nationalism) in
our foundational principles. To some national socialists, this is high treason and can never
be accepted. According to these hardcore national socialists we are just as bad as the
Marxists.

Needless to say, at the end of the day, we have the sympathy of the European peoples,
while they have considerably less support.

Q: I guess you wanted to tell your friends about this. Has it been hard to live a
“double life”, hiding your true political conservative revolutionary convictions?

A: At first it was extremely hard to avoid the temptation to tell your closest friends. I
decided however to withhold all relevant information from them and everyone, not
because I didn’t trust them, but rather because I wanted to avoid incriminating them.
Revealing sensitive information to any of them would put them in a difficult spot, because
they would be required by law to report this info to the authorities. It would also pose a
serious threat to me if they decided to tell anyone. Adding any cell commanders on MSN
or other online networks would be completely idiotic and reckless and would violate my
oath. As such, I therefore only corresponded with moderate people who had no clue
whatsoever about my clandestine activities. After all, a Justiciar Knight is not an
ideologically insecure individual. A Justiciar Knight does not rely on constant babysitting
or “patting on the back”. He is self driven and ideologically confident with proven daily
rituals/meditation which keeps him going.

A couple of my friends have their suspicions though. However, I have managed to
channel these suspicions far away from relating to my political convictions. Instead they
suspect that I am playing WoW (and trying to hide it) and a couple of them believe that I
have chosen semi-isolation because of some alleged homosexual relationship which they
suspect I am trying to hide, LOL. Quite hilarious, as I am 100% hetero, but they may
continue to believe what they want as it prevents them from asking more questions;))
My goal is obviously to prevent my closest network from asking specific questions, and it
has worked perfectly so far.

Q: What motivates you? How have you managed to stay focused and motivated
for more than 8 years? Is it bitterness and hate towards the so called ”cultural
Marxist/multiculturalist elites” or perhaps towards Islam?

A: No, not at all. In fact, if they (the cultural Marxists) against all odds renounced
multiculturalism today, halted all Muslim immigration and started deportation of all
Muslims I would forgive them for their past crimes, and I think most Europeans would as
well, despite the fact that more than 15 000 Europeans have died and 500 000 have
been raped and/or ravaged physically or mentally due to multiculturalism. If they refuse
to surrender before 2020 it will be no turning back. We will eventually annihilate every
single one of them. They should know this so I hope they surrender before the deadline.
If they continue to defy the will of Europeans for decades to come and force Europe to
the brink of catastrophe, they will be shown no mercy. It will be an extremely bloody
reckoning and thousands of them will most likely be executed.

Secondly, I don’t hate Muslims at all. I acknowledge that there are magnificent Muslim
individuals in Europe. In fact, I have had several Muslim friends over the years, some of
which I still respect. This does not mean however that I will accept an Islamic presence
in Europe. Muslim individuals who do not assimilate 100% within 2020 will be deported
as soon as we manage to seize power.

Although I do admit that I am disgusted by the current development, I would rather say
I’m driven by my love for Europe, European culture and all Europeans. This does not
mean that I oppose diversity. But appreciating diversity does not mean that you support
genocide of your own culture and people by accepting f example Islamic Demographic
Warfare.

Q: How would you view your own current political standpoints 15 years ago?

A: I would most likely think I was a complete nut job due to the fact that I was ignorant
about most issues then. But if you actually take the time to study the non-PC
documentation available you cannot avoid making many of the same conclusions I have
made today.

Fighting for your people’s survival, when threatened, is the most logical thing to do to.
Defending your people and culture from genocide is the most basic and recognised
human right and one of few causes actually worth dying for. I do not regret any of my
actions or major life choices. In fact, I would do it all again, without any hesitation, if I
was given the chance.

Q: You know that a large majority of people will end up viewing you as a
complete nut right, despite your own and others efforts to justify violence?

A: I am fully aware that the media will attempt to label me as a nut. This is the most
common strategy of combating political dissidents. I know that the cultural Marxists and
the full force of the European multiculturalist mainstream media will do everything within
their power to portray people like me as nothing more than delusional nut jobs. After all
it’s their job to protect their interests. And they will succeed to a certain degree (we are
currently too disorganised to counter their powerful propaganda machinery). I am fully
aware that our current views are considered extreme. However, more spectacular
operations will burden them and force public discussion. It will be increasingly harder for
them to manipulate and distort the truth, or to prevent people from knowing what is
going on. We are using brutal means because we have tried absolutely everything else.
Within the boundaries of the EUSSR totalitarian system, we are left no choice.
With time (in phase 2 when the Muslims have reached 20-50%) more and more people
will dig deeper into our material and understand that we are right.

Q: But doesn’t it worry you that 95% of all Europeans will openly detest you
and call you a murderer and a terrorist?

A: It’s human nature to be selfish, to seek admiration, love and affection. This is why
very few people will have the self insight, the ideological and moral confidence and
strength to act selflessly on behalf of their own countrymen on their own initiative
without a solid hierarchical organisation or country supporting and encouraging them. We
have taken these thankless tasks upon ourselves because we possess these traits; the
self insight, the ideological and moral confidence and strenght and we are willing to
sacrifice our lives for our brothers and sisters, even though they will openly detest us. It
can be illustrated like a parent spanking their ignorant child. The child will hate their
parents there and then but in time they will understand that their only intention is to
protect them. In phase 2 and 3, many of these brothers and sisters will hold our banner
and chant our hymns because they finally understand.

Q: How do you manage to motivate yourself considering the fact that you are
planning a large operation alone, with no one to confide in?

A: It has been a long term process since I first decided I wanted to contribute. But it’s
not like I have been isolated for years. I have almost lived a normal life up until now. I
still have a close relationship with my friends and family, just not as tight as it used to
be. As for my current situation, I have been working on this book now for almost two
years. It’s essential that you reward yourself and enjoy life in this period. You can do
things you normally wouldn’t have done. You can basically live a normal life if you chose
to; you just have to be extra careful. I have been practising certain rituals and
meditation to strengthen my beliefs and convictions. For me, the most common ritual is
taking a long walk listening to my favourite music on my Ipod. I just love vocal
Elektronika, very powerful. This is done while brainstorming for new angles I might have
missed and mentally simulating every detail of the operation. Do whatever works for you.
The most important thing is being ready when the day comes, to not hesitate.
Overcoming your fear is the most difficult task. It’s essential to prepare yourself mentally
for this.

Q: Do you oppose all aspects of multiculturalism?

A: No, I don’t. I support the continued consolidation of non-Muslim Europe and an
unconditional support to all Christian countries and societies (Israel included), in addition
to continuing our good relationships with all Hindu and Buddhist countries.
As such, I don’t support the deportation of non-Muslims from Europe as long as they are
fully assimilated (I’m a supporter of many of the Japanese/Taiwan/South Korean
policies/principles). However, we should take a break from mass immigration in general
(as of 2008 numbers). Any future immigration needs to be strictly controlled and
exclusively non-Muslim. Emphasis should be on individuals who can greatly benefit
Europe in some way. This immigration break should be used to demonstrate clearly that
Europe will no longer serve as the dumping ground for excess population growth in other
countries. We have cultures that we’d like to preserve, as well, and cannot and should
not be expected to accept unlimited number of migrants from other countries.
The Islamic world on the other hand should be completely isolated and Islam reclassified
and banned as a fascist/imperialistic and genocidal political ideology.

Q: What great nationalist statesmen inspire you?

A: Winston Churchill, Otto von Bismarck

However, our role models MUST be the great nationalist struggles of the past, because
politics is nothing at all but the historical process at work in the present. So we need to
study the Wind of Change that blew through Africa in the 1950s, now that we too are
living under anti-European discrimination in the EU Colonial Empires (EUSSR). Study Mao
Tse-Dong (The Great Helmsman), once a role model for the Left, now a possible Rightist
role model: leader of China’s National Revival. Was he ever a Communist at all?
Study Otto von Bismarck, not Adolf (the former was precursor of the modern Right, the
latter precursor of the contemporary left). Study the Italian Risorgimento of the 19th
century, which was a vast movement of National Revival (not a conspiracy by small
elites, as the textbooks say) and an Alliance between the aristocratic Right (Count
Cavour[1] and King Victor Emmanuel[2]) and the Revolutionary Left (Garibaldi[3]). And
look at Ataturk’s revival of Turkey after the collapse of the Ottoman Empire (led by the
military). Ireland and Israel have had Nationalist struggles in the last century we can
very usefully learn from. In each case, a handful of visionaries raised whole nations, after
centuries (even millennia) of oppression. Theodor Herzl, founder of Zionism, was
ridiculed and died after only 8 years in politics, convinced of his own failure.
Remember the spider in Robert the Bruce’s cave: each time its web was blown away, it
wove again and Bruce was inspired to re-weave the web of Scots Nationhood: still going
strong 780 years later.

We must study Athelstan, Alfred and Edgar of Wessex, who did not give up, just because
everyone told him that England was finished. Neither Boudicca, nor Caractacus should be
our heroes, because they both failed quickly and miserably. It was Cassivellaunus who
defeated Caesar two years running and Calgacus who saved Albion (North Britain) from
the Romans. For 465 years the Romans were occupying half of Britain: the brave British
patriots never gave up resistance (12 Vietnams laid end to end) and the Romans were
eventually driven out.

There are many great historical nationalist statesmen worth studying. Even if the
situation looks grim now, it will never be too late. Never surrender!
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Count_Cavour
2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Emmanuel_II_of_Italy
3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garibaldi

Q: What is your view on the duties of non-Muslim minorities in Western Europe?

A: The European Jewish, Buddhist and Hindu community has a right but also a duty to
join in the fight against the Islamisation of Europe. I welcome and encourage all non-
Muslim minorities to join us in this fight.

The indigenous peoples of Europe will succeed to seize power in Western Europe by 2080
due to the ongoing Islamisation, with or without the support of minority communities. I
sincerely hope that the majority of non-Muslim minorities will support the “new right” and
by doing so show where their loyalty is. You cannot be neutral in this struggle. You are
either a supporter of multiculturalism or you support the struggle against the Islamisation
of Europe. If the non-Muslim minorities aren’t proportionally represented in our struggle
they risk losing credibility as reliant allies which can have unknown consequences under
certain circumstances.

Q: Can the mainstream media prevent a continued right wing consolidation?

A: They will continue with their old strategies, labelling everyone who opposes the
Islamisation of Europe/European multiculturalism as Nazi’s and racists.
Fjordman illustrates it well:

“The thinking seems to be that if you scratch any random European there is usually a Nazi
lurking underneath, just waiting to get out. There are only two possible versions of
Europeans: the surrender-monkeys and the Nazis. If we are not the former, then it follows
by logic that we have to be the latter. This attitude betrays an all-pervasive hatred that
demonises absolutely anything Europeans do to protect their dignity and heritage. “

This will work for them as long as the government manages to keep unemployment low
and maintain the current level of welfare. Unfortunately for them, it is just a matter of
time before the Western European economies completely collapses. I know for a fact that
it will happen within 20-70 years.

Q: Name seven traits you consider most important as a cell operative:

A: Ideological confidence, patience, the ability to motivate yourself, keeping sensitive
information to yourself, resourcefulness, being pragmatical and insightfulness in your
own psyche.

Q: What should be our civilisational objectives, how do you envision a perfect
Europe?

A: “Logic” and rationalist thought (a certain degree of national Darwinism) should be the
fundament of our societies. I support the propagation of collective rational thought but
not necessarily on a personal level. Because, if a woman was purely rational, she would
choose to not have babies at all, and instead live her life in a purely egotistical manner.
We should strive to become a civilisation where the individual’s acquisition of wealth
would no longer be the driving force in our lives. Instead, we would focus much more of
our resources to better ourselves and our communities by channelling at least 20% of the
budget to research, science and technology. Good welfare arrangements combined with
embracing the ideal of perfection requires a solid cooperation/symbiosis (social cohesion)
and is only possible in a monoculture where everyone has complete confidence to
everyone. The problem with today’s society is that it has become fanatically egalitarian.
In our quest to appease everyone (except the traditional cultural group) we have created
a habit and tradition of cheering mediocrity and weakness. Your position in the “victim
hierarchy” decides your position in society. It’s an illogical and self defeating
development.

As for the future servant class; I have described this in another chapter (insourcing of
labour for 6 month contracts offering them less than 20% of Western salaries). This
servant class model ensures that all European citizens is treated with decency and
offered every possibility to advance. However, it will be almost impossible to gain
citizenship for non-European immigrants.

Your personal life
Q: Can you describe your childhood?

A: My father, Jens Breivik, had three children from a former marriage; Erik, Jan and Nina
while my mother, Wenche Behring had a daughter from a past relationship; Elisabeth. My
parents divorced when I was 1 years old. Me, my sister and my parents; Wenche (a
nurse), Jens (siviløkonom) was living in London at the time as he worked as a diplomat
for the Royal Norwegian Embassy in London (and later Paris). Jens stayed in London and
later married Tove Øvermo who also worked in the Royal Norwegian Embassy. Wenche,
Elisabeth and myself moved back to Oslo and settled on Skøyen, Oslo West. My mother,
Wenche met my stepfather, Tore, who was a captain in the Norwegian Army. My
stepmother, Tove, later became a Vice Consul and my father was a Commercial
Councellor for the Royal Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs abroad, first in London and
then in Paris.

My parents were not politically active but supported the policies of the Norwegian Labour
Party which was common for most individuals working in the public sector. My stepfather,
Tore, was a moderately right wing while my stepmother, Tove, was a moderate cultural
Marxist and feminist. My mom, Wenche, was an apolitical moderate feminist.

Jens and Tove wanted child custody and wanted to raise me in Paris. They lost the child
custody case in an Oslo court a few years later.

I visited Jens and Tove on a regular basis in Paris and at our summer house/cottage in
Normandie, FR and Notodden, NO until they divorced when I was 12. I had a good
relationship with him and his new wife at the time, Tove Øvermo, until I was 15. I still
have contact with Tove until this day but have not spoken to my father since he isolated
himself when I was 15 (he wasn’t very happy about my graffiti phase from 13-16:). He
has four children but has cut contact with all of them so it is pretty clear whose fault that
was. I don’t carry any grudge but a couple of my half siblings do. The thing is that he is
just not very good with people. I tried contacting him five years ago but he said he was
not mentally prepared for a reunion due to various factors, his poor health being one.
Tore, my stepfather, worked as a major in the Norwegian military and is now retired. I
still have contact with him although now he spends most his time (retirement) with
prostitutes in Thailand. He is a very primitive sexual beast, but at the same time a very
likable and good guy. I can’t say I approve of that lifestyle although I can’t really blame
him when I see today’s Marxist social structures. So all in all, I consider myself privileged
and I feel I have had a privileged upbringing with responsible and intelligent people
around me. I do not approve of the super-liberal, matriarchal upbringing though as it
completely lacked discipline and has contributed to feminise me to a certain degree.
I haven’t really had any negative experiences in my childhood in any way. I had way too
much freedom though if anything. I used to visit my father annually until I was 16. So
guess I came from a typical Norwegian middle class family. We never had any economical
troubles.

I have a good relationship with my four half siblings, Nina, Erik and Jan but especially
Elisabeth. We get together a couple of times a year. Elisabeth moved to Los Angeles 14
years ago and is now settled down with two kids, Kaia and Tyler. I talk to her once a
month. Both she and her husband are moderately conservative but generally live their
life as apolitical career cynicists. Two of my other half siblings are conservative, one
moderately conservative. They are generally apolitical but I am very happy for the fact
that a majority of my extended family are intelligent and relatively anti-Marxist. Erik’s
girlfriend though is a super-feminist and quite radical Marxist. We have had some very
interesting conversations where she has almost physically strangled me:D

I went to the following institutions;
– Vigelandsparken kindergarden
– Smestad primary school
– Ris secondary School
– Hartvig Nissen High School
– Oslo Handelsgym High School

Q: How would you describe yourself as a person?

A: I consider myself to be a laid back type and quite tolerant on most issues.
Due to the fact that I have been exposed to decades of multicultural indoctrination I feel
a need to emphasise that I am not in fact a racist and never have been.

My Godmother (being baptised when I was 15 years old), Amelia Jimenez and her
husband, came to Norway as political refugees from Chile. In retrospect I understood
that they were Marxist political activists but I didn’t comprehend these issues at the time.
Our two families have been very close throughout my childhood and youth. I’ve had
several non-Norwegian and Muslim friends. I spent a lot of time with Onor, a Turk,
Jonathan an Eritrean, Raol and Natalie from Chile, Arsalan Ahmad Sohail, Faizal and
Wazim from Pakistan. I’ve had dozens of non-Norwegian friends during my younger
years, Bashir from Somalia, Pablo from Chile, Odd Erling – adopted from Columbia, Lene
– adopted from India have been good friends and a couple of them still are today.

Q: Why did you have so many non-ethnic Norwegian friends?

A: I remember that pride and certain moral codexes/principles have always been very
important to me. As a result, individuals with these traits appealed to me. If I ever got in
to trouble I expected my friends to back me up 100% without submitting or running
away, as I would for them. Very few ethnic Norwegians shared these principles. They
would either “sissy out”, allow themselves to be subdued or run away when facing a
threat. This was an unacceptable scenario for me. If anyone threatened me or my
friends, regardless if we were at a disadvantage, we would rather face our foes than to
submit and lose face. If we did get beaten we would just rally our allies and get back at
them later. Pride was more important than anything. This type of attitude gave us a big
advantage. No one would risk messing with us, even the kids 2 years older.

The majority of people who shared these principles of pride was the Muslim youths and
the occasional skinhead. However, even back then, the Muslims outnumbered the
skinheads 20 to 1. Being a skinhead was never an option for me. Their dress codes and
taste of music was unappealing and I thought they were too extreme. I hated rock then
and I still do.

Q: Violent Muslim gangs in European cities are not exactly a new phenomenon.
We hear about indigenous European youths getting harassed, beaten, raped and
robbed quite often. Tell us about your experiences during your “vulnerable
years”(14-18) growing up in the urban multicultural streets of Oslo.

A: Since I was 12 years old I was into the hip-hop movement. For several years I was
one of the most notable “hip-hop’ers” from Oslo’s West side. It was a lot easier to “gain
respect and credibility” in Oslo West because of the demographic factors. Oslo West was
the “privileged and predominantly native side” of Oslo with very few immigrants in
contrast to the East side which was less peaceful. Graffiti and break dance was an
important part of our life at that point. Around 1993 and 1994, at 15, I was the most
active tagger (grafitti artist) in Oslo as several people in the old school hip-hop
community can attest to. Our standard “graffiti raid” consisted of going out at night, in
groups of 2-3, with our backpacks full of spray cans. We took our bikes and “bombed”
city blocks with our tags, “pieces” and crew name all over Oslo. “, Wick and
Spok” was everywhere. The fact that hundreds of kids our own age all over Oslo West
and even Oslo East looked up to us was one of the driving forces I guess. At that time it
felt very rewarding to us. If you wanted girls and respect then it was all about the hip
hop community at that time. The more reckless you were the more respect and
admiration you gained.

Everyone didn’t approve though. The government had a no-tolerance attitude towards
graffiti and removed 90% of our “creations” within 48 hours. I remember it was an
unofficial war between the hip-hop community and the government and Oslo Sporveier,
our public subway company. Two guys I knew, Stian and Charles, a few years older than
me were arrested, received gigantic fines and was put in jail. The hip-hop movement In
Norway had its climax around that time, in 92-93. The community was very “politically
correct” in nature with close ties to the extreme left groups like SOS Rasisme (an
extreme left wing movement) and Blitz (a violent left wing extremist movement). I
remember we used to hang out with various people and groups all over Oslo. There were
plenty of hip-hop concerts at Blitz and it was at this time that the communist hip-hop
group; “Gatas Parlament” was created. It’s hard to imagine but during this time everyone
was into graffiti and hip-hop.

I remember my friends at that time; Jon Trygve, Richard and Arsalan, we did everything
together. In fact, it was my Muslim friend who sparked my interest for Christianity, Islam
and politics in general. We had countless discussions relating to culture, geo-politics etc.
At the time, I couldn’t understand why he loathed Norway and my culture so much. He
simply despised it and I was unable to truly comprehend why at the time. The school
curriculum was a joke, as all we learned about Islam was that it was the religion of
peace, often spread my merchants. However, this was one of the primary reasons why I
started to appreciate my own religion and culture to a larger degree and why I wanted to
seek alternative sources which could explain more. I remember during the first Gulf war,
he used to cheer loudly whenever a scud missile was launched against the Americans. I
was completely ignorant at the time and apolitical but his total lack of respect for my
culture (and Western culture in general) actually sparked my interest and passion for it.
Thanks to him I gradually developed a passion for my own cultural identity. This was
apparently very annoying for him, as I was unwilling to convert to Islam. Instead, I
suggested he convert to Christianity and embrace our norms and culture.

We used to hang out with GSV crew, or B-Gjengen as they are popularly called today, a
Muslim Pakistani gang, quite violent even back then. “Gang alliances” was a part of our
everyday life at that point and assured that you avoided threats and harassment.
Alliances with the right people guaranteed safe passage everywhere without the risk of
being subdued and robbed (Jizya), beaten or harassed. We had close ties with B-Gjengen
(B-Gang) and A-Gjengen (A-Gang), both Muslim Pakistani gangs through my best friend
Arsalan who was also a Pakistani. Even at that time, the Muslim gangs were very
dominating in Oslo East and in inner city Oslo. They even arranged “raids” in Oslo West
occasionally, subduing the native youths (kuffars) and collecting Jizya from them (in the
form of cell phones, cash, sunglasses etc.). I remember they systematically harassed,
robbed and beat ethnic Norwegian youngsters who were unfortunate enough to not have
the right affiliations. Muslim youths called the ethnic Norwegians “poteter” (potatoes, a
derogatory term used by Muslims to describe ethnic Norwegians). These people
occasionally raped the so called “potato whores”. In Oslo, as an ethnic Norwegian youth
aged 14-18 you were restricted if you didn’t have affiliations to the Muslim gangs. Your
travel was restricted to your own neighbourhoods in Oslo West and certain central points
in the city. Unless you had Muslim contacts you could easily be subject to harassment,
beatings and robbery. Our alliances with the Muslim gangs were strictly seen as a
necessity for us, at least for me. We, however, due to our alliances had the freedom of
movement. As a result of our alliances we were allowed to have a relaxing and secure
position on the West side of Oslo among our age group. Think of it as being local
“warlords” for certain “kuffar areas”, which were regulated by the only dominant force,
Muslim gangs collaberating with anarcho-Marxist networks.

Many of these groups claim to be tolerant and anti-fascist, but yet, I have never met
anyone as hypocritical, racist and fascist as the people whom I used to call friends and
allies. The media glorifies them while they wreck havoc across the city, rob and plunder.
Yet, any attempts their victims do to consolidate are harshly condemned by all aspects of
the cultural establishment as racism and Nazism. I have witnessed the double standards
and hypocrisy with my own eyes, it is hard to ignore. I was one of the protected
“potatoes”, having friends and allies in the Jihadi-racist gangs such as the A and B gang
and many other Muslim gangs.

I gradually became appalled by the mentality, actions and hypocrisy of what he calls the
“Marxist-Jihadi youth” movement of Oslo disguised under more socially acceptable brands
such as: “SOS Rasisme”, “Youth against Racism”, Blitz who literally hijacked segments of
the hiphop movement and used it as a front for recruitment.

I have personally heard of and witnessed hundreds of Jihadi-racist attacks, more than
90% of them aimed at helpless Norwegian youth (who themselves are brought up to be
“suicidally” tolerant and therefore are completely unprepared mentally for attacks such
as these). This happens while the Marxist networks in the hiphop movement and the
cultural establishment silently and indirectly condone it. There is absolutely no political
will to ensure that justice is served on behalf of these victims. I remember at one point
thinking; “This system makes me sick”.

Q: Did you ever contribute to the Muslim atrocities against the indigenous
during this period?

A: I saw the “security alliances” in a strictly pragmatical way. They were a necessary evil
at that time. During these years I heard of hundreds of cases where ethnic Norwegians
were harassed, robbed and beaten by Muslim gangs. This type of behaviour was in fact
acts of racism or even based on religious motives (Jihadi behaviour), although I failed to
see that connection then due to lack of knowledge about Islam; I saw the practical
manifestations and I didn’t like it at all. The only thing you could do was to take the
necessary precautions, create alliances or be subdued by them. If you made any attempt
to create a “Norwegian gang” you would be instantly labelled as a Nazi and face the
wrath of everyone, in addition to the Muslim gangs. They, however, were allowed to do
anything while being indirectly cheered by society. So in other words, we were trapped
between the “wood and the bark”. This is still the case in all Western European major
cities. They are allowed to consolidate, while we are not.

I never took part in any of their activities and I never participated in any Blitz
demonstrations either. To me, that would have been too hypocritical seeing that the
Muslim gangs and their “racist/Jihadi” behaviour was tolerated by the police, media and
the violent left wing extremists (ANTIFA) like “Blitz” and “SOS Rasisme”. I left the hiphop
community and the gangs when I was 16 and never looked back.

Q: Tell me about your school performance?

A: Despite the above, me, Jon Trygve, Richard and Arsalan were doing well at school up
until then. I noticed that most of the active people within the hip-hop movement were
academically weak and I didn’t want to end up like them. Hasjis was now a very natural
thing in this community but I chose to stay away from it. I was 16 years old at this time.
My decision to focus more on school and my principle to never try drugs was the
beginning of the end for my friendship with Jon Trygve, Richard, Arsalan and my
“departure” from the hip-hop community in Oslo. One day there was an incident and my
close friendship with them ended. They chose to continue the same path without me,
increasingly becoming more active in criminal and violent activities and more into drugs.

Q: What was your relationship with the so called neo-Nazis, skinheads and right
wing people at that time?

A: Being so called neo-Nazi, skinhead or right wing in general meant that you were into
Metal rock. I hated Metal rock and I hate it even today. I knew a few guys from my age
group growing up, Edward, Nils and 5 others. They attended the same school as us and a
couple of them were uniformed skinheads at this time. I know they never really believed
in the National Socialist ideology, they were more anti-immigrant and wanted to state a
point rather than anything else. I had known them vaguely for several years but I didn’t
have a lot in common with them. Most people at my school had a good relationship with
them, myself included. They didn’t cause any problems, weren’t violent and respected
the rules, unlike us. The exception was Arsalan who had a clash with Edward at one time.
Arsalan was one of the very few Pakistanis at my school.

As for the right wing community at that time, it was simple. They loved metal and we
loved hip-hop. Being into the very small right wing community or the larger mainstream
rock community meant Goth girls and hard rock. I disliked both. The big irony was that
they; Edward and his friends, were a lot more “normal” than us during this period. They
were peaceful while we were violent. They followed the law and rules while we broke the
law and ignored the rules again and again. At the same time, the hip-hop community was
cheered by the media, praised as the pinnacle of tolerance among the new generation,
while THEY were condemned for their political views, systematically harassed and beaten
by non-white gangs, extremist Marxist gangs (Blitz etc) and the police. It’s quite ironic
and shamefull.

The irony and hypocrisy becomes absolute considering the fact that a large core of the
hip-hop movement through rappers like Tupac, Nas, Lauryn Hill or other artists like Bob
Marley etc. are in essence quite racist and anti-European in nature. Yet, millions of ethnic
European youths love their music. We obviously didn’t create these rules. We just chose
to go with the flow at that time as most people did and still do today. The deeper
meaning of their texts didn’t bother us much.

The lefties/hip-hop movement, including the Pakistani gangs and other minority gangs –
in cooperation with SOS Rasisme and Blitz were notorically and systematically violent,
even racist and discriminating towards ethnic Norwegian youths and anti-immigrant
individuals. They abused drugs and many were involved in criminal activity, yet cheered
by the media because of their “tolerance” and so called “anti-racist” attitude.

Intolerance, racism and acts of Jihad were tolerated against native Norwegians as the
perpetrators were categorised as victims by default (as minorities). They were seldom
punished properly.

I remember the occasional crackdowns on right wing youth movements during this
period. The police raided them several times, called their parents and invested a lot of
resources on squashing the right wing movement all over Norway. Blitz and other
extreme left, SOS Rasisme and the hip-hop community on the other hand received public
funding. The Blitz house, a building they had occupied a few decades earlier, was
subsidised and under protection by the government in Oslo and still is even today. They
are often referred to as the “storm troops” of the Norwegian Labour Party. The
government subsidy of the apartment block were Blitz resides equates to more than 3
million USD per year alone. The violent Marxist group “SOS Rasisme” receives 2-3 million
NOK annually. It’s disgusting.

Anyway, at this time I was 16 years old. I had been somewhat political aware for 2-3
years already and I had grown to be a passive “anti-racist” but against non-Western
immigration. However, the fact that I opposed non-Western immigration automatically
meant that I had become a “racist” according to the definitions of the “politically correct
elites” and the leftists. I therefore kept this to myself.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwitterrss
Facebooktwittermail

3 thoughts on “The Anders Behring Breivik interview

  1. pangloss

    Other reason for insanity plea is the Norwegian justice system which only allows a maximum prison term of 21 years, I think. However an individual who is deemed insane can be held indefinitely being examined every 5 years to determine if the illness persists.

  2. Dr. med. Dorothea Boehm

    Thank you for publishing this “Self-Interview” of Breivik.

    I quite agree: He doesn´t seem to be “mad” in terms of schizophrenia or paranoia, but it is likely that he is a psychopath in the biopsychical sense, which means that his personality is distorted by an antisocial personality disorder.

    Get some more childhood details if you can: As being psychopathic he might have been identifiable as a school-age child by an obvious ignorance for babies and toddlers, disinterest in (or even cruelty to) animals, and a pronounced tendency towards selfcentered interests and selfish behaviour.
    He attended “Vigelandsparken kindergarden”. Try to find out, from what age on Breivik as a child had been in daycare. If this was before age 3, then the antisocial traits of his personality were systematically enhanced since according to recent scientific evidence group daycare compromises the development of self-regulation and empathy.

  3. eatbees

    In researching what Breivik means by “Justiciar Knight” I came across numerous references to the world of online gaming, which we know from his manifesto has occupied huge amounts of his time in the past. This led me to feel that he may in fact be insane (though extremely lucid) to the point that he’s confused the two worlds and actually thinks he’s living out some kind of gaming quest. And then, while researching a different topic (the LulzSec arrests) I came across this article from an internet security–related site where the author mines Breivik’s manifesto to reach the same conclusion.

    http://krypt3ia.wordpress.com/2011/07/27/the-many-minds-of-anders-breivik-aka-sigurd-justiciar-templar-knight/

    Something to consider! Nevertheless I agree with you, as do even a few of the more honest commenters on sites like Gates of Vienna, that on the surface there is very little in Breivik’s ideology to distinguish him from the views expressed there. His desire for an extreme European nationalism that is anti-Islamic and pro-Israel without being racist or intolerant to personal liberty is (while internally inconsistent) completely in tune with the writers he most admires, like Fjordman and Robert Spencer. He also shares the selective attention to ideas that reinforce his own that is typical of the followers of counter-Jihadi websites. (One example is their insistence that 99% of all terrorism in the West comes from Muslims, when in fact it is more like 1%.) What distinguishes Breivik is that he has used these ideas, merged with tropes from online gaming, to fuel a personal fantasy in which he could play the lone hero whose slaughter of innocents would awake Europe to the need for action. I don’t normally agree with Pam Geller, but perhaps her analogy with Helter Skelter is on target here. Actions like Breivik’s may be the ultimate logical outcome of counter-Jihadi ideas, but very few of those who believe such things would follow them all the way to their extreme conclusion as he did. Let’s hope this is a warning to them and cause for introspection.

Comments are closed.