The New York Times reports: Riot police officers tear-gassing protesters at the Occupy movement in Oakland. The surprising nighttime invasion of Zuccotti Park in Lower Manhattan, carried out with D-Day-like secrecy by officers deploying klieg lights and a military-style sound machine. And campus police officers in helmets and face shields dousing demonstrators at the University of California, Davis with pepper spray.
Is this the militarization of the American police?
Police forces undeniably share a soldier’s ethos, no matter the size of the city, town or jurisdiction: officers carry deadly weapons and wear uniforms with patches denoting rank. They salute one another and pay homage to a “Yes, sir,” “No, sir,” hierarchical culture.
But beyond such symbolic and formal similarities, American law and tradition have tried to draw a clear line between police and military forces. To cast the roles of the two too closely, those in and out of law enforcement say, is to mistake the mission of each. Soldiers, after all, go to war to destroy, and kill the enemy. The police, who are supposed to maintain the peace, “are the citizens, and the citizens are the police,” according to Chief Walter A. McNeil of Quincy, Fla., the president of the International Association of Chiefs of Police, citing the words of Sir Robert Peel, the father of modern-day policing.
Yet lately images from Occupy protests streamed on the Internet — often in real time — show just how readily police officers can adopt military-style tactics and equipment, and come off more like soldiers as they face down citizens. Some say this adds up to the emergence of a new, more militaristic breed of civilian police officer. Others disagree.
What seems clear is that the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, and the federal Homeland Security dollars that flowed to police forces in response to them, have further encouraged police forces to embrace paramilitary tactics like those that first emerged in the decades-long “war on drugs.”
Both wars — first on drugs, then terror — have lent police forces across the country justification to acquire the latest technology, equipment and tactical training for newly created specialized units.
Related Posts...
- Colonized by corporations
- Louisiana’s prison-industrial complex
- Video: Have trade unions lost their clout?
- Lobbyists, guns and money
- What if democracy is just an illusion?
- Is CISPA, SOPA 2.0? The new cybersecurity bill explained
- Facebook and Google turned into government spies? The dangerous new law before Congress (CISPA)
- 39 ways to limit free speech
- Why I’m suing the U.S. government to protect internet freedom
- How Britain destroyed the father of computer science
- What happens when government is no longer by the people
- ‘We the People’ loses appeal with people around the world
- Forget super PACs. A modest proposal for legalizing bribery
- The uphill battle against Citizens United
- ‘The American Empire is over and the descent is going to be horrifying!’
- Schools in the Texas police state
- The growing militarisation of police
- Obama and the rule of law
- Predator drones employed by U.S. police
- Senate votes not to vote on indefinite detention on Americans
- Spain’s indignado protesters mark anniversary of anti-austerity rallies
- Bored with Occupy — and inequality
- The rise of the Occupy movement makes it clear the institutional church has failed
- The corporate media’s attempt to kill the Occupy movement
- Adbusters’ Kalle Lasn on Occupy and a resurgent Left
Related Posts...
Related Posts...
Related Posts...
Related Posts...
Previous post: A CEO’s moral stand
Next post: Nothing’s free

{ 1 comment }
The NYT article does its best to soft pedal the threats of paramilitary policing, and it completely ignores the immense amount of training carried out by specialists in Israeli style security tactics evolved in subduing Palestinian protests — detailed in the article here yesterday. Either the police are equal citizens among a community of equal citizens, charged with protecting those citizens, or they are a specialised enforcement organisation equipped and trained to take down any group within society that the ‘authorities’ want silenced. There are no two ways to have it.