Drug agents access vast phone database, larger than the NSA’s

The New York Times reports: For at least six years, law enforcement officials working on a counternarcotics program have had routine access, using subpoenas, to an enormous AT&T database that contains the records of decades of Americans’ phone calls — parallel to but covering a far longer time than the National Security Agency’s hotly disputed collection of phone call logs.

The Hemisphere Project, a partnership between federal and local drug officials and AT&T that has not previously been reported, involves an extremely close association between the government and the telecommunications giant.

The government pays AT&T to place its employees in drug-fighting units around the country. Those employees sit alongside Drug Enforcement Administration agents and local detectives and supply them with the phone data from as far back as 1987.

The project comes to light at a time of vigorous public debate over the proper limits on government surveillance and on the relationship between government agencies and communications companies. It offers the most significant look to date at the use of such large-scale data for law enforcement, rather than for national security.

The scale and longevity of the data storage appears to be unmatched by other government programs, including the N.S.A.’s gathering of phone call logs under the Patriot Act. The N.S.A. stores the data for nearly all calls in the United States, including phone numbers and time and duration of calls, for five years.

Hemisphere covers every call that passes through an AT&T switch — not just those made by AT&T customers — and includes calls dating back 26 years, according to Hemisphere training slides bearing the logo of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy. Some four billion call records are added to the database every day, the slides say; technical specialists say a single call may generate more than one record. Unlike the N.S.A. data, the Hemisphere data includes information on the locations of callers. [Continue reading…]

As often happens, New York Times reporting with its fastidious attention to nuance also seems loaded with subtle insinuations. In this case, having been hooked with the revelation of this huge database, we’re then encouraged to believe that it’s actually all kosher. We’re told the project “employed routine investigative procedures used in criminal cases for decades and posed no novel privacy issues.”

It ends up sounding like an exercise in surveillance desensitization. First the alarm. Then the assurance that everything’s normal. And then the unstated conclusion: so why’s everyone making such a fuss about the NSA?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwittermail