Without Priebus, Trump is a man without a party

Tim Alberta writes: By firing [Reince Priebus], Trump has severed a critical connection to his own party—not simply to major donors and GOP congressional leaders, but to the unruly, broader constellation of conservative-affiliated organizations and individuals that Priebus had spent five years corralling. He was effortlessly tagged as an “establishment” figure—inevitably, given his title atop the party—but Priebus was a specialist at coalition-building. He convened regular meetings as RNC chairman with influential players in the conservative movement, picking their brains and taking their temperatures on various issues. That continued as chief of staff: Priebus spoke by phone with prominent activists, such as the Family Research Council’s Tony Perkins, at least once a week. There is a meeting scheduled at the White House this Wednesday of the Conservative Action Project—an umbrella group that brings together leaders from across the right—and Priebus was planning to attend. It was this kind of systematic outreach that made Priebus, whatever his flaws as a West Wing manager, an essential lieutenant for Trump.

There is no question, however, that Priebus’ absence will echo loudest on Capitol Hill—particularly in the speaker’s office. Ryan’s team had heard whispers for months of Priebus’ possible departure, but the news was nonetheless a dagger, especially on the heels of a health care defeat and at the dawn of tax-reform season. Ryan and Priebus, both Green Bay Packers fans and local beer loyalists, have been friends for decades; Ryan’s former chief of staff, Andy Speth, was Priebus’ college roommate at the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater. Priebus was the first call Ryan made when things got hairy this year, and vice versa. Working with a West Wing that contains few other true allies—and with a volatile president who has viewed him suspiciously ever since the speaker accused him of making “the textbook definition of a racist comment” about a Hispanic-American judge—Ryan saw Priebus as his staunchest ally and bunker mate. And now he’s gone.

In his place is John Kelly, a retired four-star Marine general and respected disciplinarian whose mandate is to succeed where Priebus failed: imposing order and organization on a chaotic White House. Kelly, however, is not a political figure; he did not support (or oppose) Trump’s campaign, and is not known to hold strong political or ideological inclinations. Looking around Trump’s inner circle, there is communications director Anthony Scaramucci, a political novice who in the past donated to Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton; chief strategist Steve Bannon, who used Breitbart to try and burn the Republican Party to the ground; National Economic Council director Gary Cohn, a lifelong Democrat; director of strategic communication Hope Hicks, who has zero history with GOP politics; and Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump, a pair of self-professed Manhattan progressives. Of Trump’s closest advisers, only Mike Pence has any association with the Republican Party.

This no longer seems accidental. Trump has, since taking office, consistently referred to Republicans as though he is not one himself—it’s invariably “they” or “them.” Unlike past presidents of his party, Trump entered the White House with few personal relationships with prominent Republicans: donors, lobbyists, party activists, politicians. This liberated him to say whatever he pleased as a candidate, and, by firing Priebus, Trump might feel similarly liberated. The fear now, among Republicans in his administration and on Capitol Hill, is that Trump will turn against the party, waging rhetorical warfare against a straw-man GOP whom he blames for the legislative failures and swamp-stained inertia that has bedeviled his young presidency. It would represent a new, harsher type of triangulation, turning his base against the politicians of his own party that they elected. [Continue reading…]

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

2 thoughts on “Without Priebus, Trump is a man without a party

  1. hquain

    “In his place is John Kelly, a retired four-star Marine general and respected disciplinarian whose mandate is to succeed where Priebus failed: imposing order and organization on a chaotic White House.”

    I’m mildly surprised that there’s so little comment on the absurdity of this appointment. Kelly is used to standing at the top of a large, tightly organized hierarchy where obedience is absolutely presupposed; this offers no precedent for overseeing a small nest of well-practiced snakes doing things he doesn’t understand. His last job at DHS involved 240,000 employees and $40B/yr; now he supervises a handful of low-rent grifters and self-involved loonies.

    Surely this has more to do with Trump’s eye for (playing with) authoritarian figures and his pleasure in humiliating those around him than with any new-found taste for ‘Ordnung’.

  2. Mustafa Novikoff

    Somehow what happened this week just appears contrived to me. Scaramucci is hired and immediately goes on a very unacceptable rant—unacceptable even by the standards of this very unacceptable administration. Both Spicer and Priebus, considered more “establishment” than the generals and nuts Trumps usually picks, resign. Trump says what great guys they are but remains quiet about Scaramucci’s bad words. Then General Kelly is in and immediately saves the day by firing that bad Scaramucci. The upshot is that the only people left in the cabinet are anti-Republican establishment crazies and ex-military men. To me Scaramucci seems an easy sacrifice to get what Trump wanted to begin with, which is to satisfy his very large base of apocalyptic neo-fascists; and his Tweets and public pronouncements this week have chillingly affirmed this. So I don’t think I’m remiss is saying that it all appears kind of…scripted.

Comments are closed.