Trump uses Putin’s arguments to undermine the world

Spencer Ackerman writes: The leader stepped to the podium of the United Nations General Assembly, as close to a literal world stage as exists, and issued a stringent defense of the principle of national sovereignty.

“What is the state sovereignty, after all, that has been mentioned by our colleagues here? It is basically about freedom and the right to choose freely one’s own future for every person, nation and state,” he said, attacking what he identified as the hypocrisy of those who seek to violate sovereignty in the name of stopping mass murder.

“Aggressive foreign interference,” the leader continued, “has resulted in a brazen destruction of national institutions and the lifestyle itself. Instead of the triumph of democracy and progress, we got violence, poverty and social disaster.”

The leader was not Donald Trump on Tuesday, but Vladimir Putin in 2015. Whatever nexus between Putin and Trump exists for Robert Mueller to discover, the evidence of their compatible visions of foreign affairs was on display at the United Nations clearer than ever, with Trump’s aggressive incantation of “sovereignty, security and prosperity” as the path to world peace. “There can be no substitute for strong, sovereign, and independent nations, nations that are rooted in the histories and invested in their destiny,” Trump said, hitting his familiar blood-and-soil themes that echo from the darker moments in European history. [Continue reading…]

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwittermail

Comments

  1. Is Trump any more of a ‘nationalist’ than he is a ‘Christian’? He appears to simply want unilateral control of the resources he’s interested in acquiring as well as destruction of those he wishes to destroy, and he’ll adopt any slogan or posture that helps. It’s reasonable to conjecture that he sees in Putin a like-minded individual and that he and his group have been trying for a while to make a wide-ranging, mutually-enriching deal with him.

    From this point of view, people like Bannon and Miller are merely ‘content-providers’.