IDF to finally engage Goldstone, day late dollar short
by Paul Woodward on January 24, 2010
IDF to finally engage Goldstone, day late dollar short
By Richard Silverstein, Tikun Olam, January, 2010
Ethan Bronner writes a N.Y. Times report on a new propaganda offensive by the IDF against the Goldstone Report. It seems Israel has finally decided to engage with the document’s claims that Israel may have committed war crimes during last year’s Gaza war. Of course, it could’ve done so by testifying to the UN investigative body so that Israel’s perspective could’ve been incorporated into the finished document. At the time, Israel evidently judged it could filibuster and disparage this effort, as they have so many previous international attempts to hold Israel accountable for its actions concerning the Palestinians. But for some reason, Goldstone has developed much more staying power than other similar past efforts. [continued...]
— Richard Silverstein does a nice job of critiquing the Bronner article — the only other thing I was struck by was the Netanyahu quote naming Israel’s three-pronged axis of evil: “We face three major strategic challenges: The Iranian nuclear program, rockets aimed at our civilians and Goldstone.”
Wow! Richard Goldstone, the diminutive and rather modest judge from South Africa, now poses an existential threat to Israel!
Or am I reading that the wrong way round? Maybe Netanyahu is moderating his rhetoric and conceding that Israel does not actually face external existential threats. Existential threats may well persist, but these would be the ones of Israel’s own making.
print this post
IDF to finally engage Goldstone, day late dollar short
by Paul Woodward on January 24, 2010
IDF to finally engage Goldstone, day late dollar short
By Richard Silverstein, Tikun Olam, January, 2010
Ethan Bronner writes a N.Y. Times report on a new propaganda offensive by the IDF against the Goldstone Report. It seems Israel has finally decided to engage with the document’s claims that Israel may have committed war crimes during last year’s Gaza war. Of course, it could’ve done so by testifying to the UN investigative body so that Israel’s perspective could’ve been incorporated into the finished document. At the time, Israel evidently judged it could filibuster and disparage this effort, as they have so many previous international attempts to hold Israel accountable for its actions concerning the Palestinians. But for some reason, Goldstone has developed much more staying power than other similar past efforts. [continued...]
Related Posts...
Related Posts...
Related Posts...
Related Posts...
Related Posts...
Previous post: After the Massachusetts massacre
Next post: The return of the neocons
Follow WiC
Subscribe
War in Context…
This site depends on reader support. If you value the information you find here, please consider offering a donation or becoming a paying subscriber:
(Find out more here.)
Site Search
Recent Posts
Blogroll
Archives
Past Archives
Categories
Meta
Get smart with the Thesis WordPress Theme from DIYthemes.
Copyright © 2007–2012 Paul Woodward
WordPress Admin