This is war, not revolution

The #Libyan people are no longer protesting, we’re simply trying to survive. This is war, not revolution. #Gaddafi changed the game. @Libyan4life

CNN reports:

At least 15 people have been killed and 200 more wounded in the Libyan city of Zawiya, an eyewitness told CNN.

Wounded people started arriving at the hospital Friday morning. Most of the injuries resulted from gunshots, and many of the injuries were to the head and chest.

The eyewitness said the hospital is running out of medical supplies.

“There is a river of blood here in the hospital. The situation is very bad,” he said.

The Washington Post reports:

Forces loyal to Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafi unleashed their fiercest counterattack yet against the opposition on Friday, assaulting rebel-held positions by ground and air and firing on demonstrators in the government stronghold of Tripoli.

The lethal force of the government offensive – including what rebels described as a “bloodbath” in the strategic western port city of Zawiyah – raised the stakes for Washington and its western allies. They have threatened military intervention should the Gaddafi government cross red lines including the systematic endangerment of defenseless civilians or if the battle for Libya evolved into a long-term, bloody stalemate.

Yet if anything, the events Friday underscored Gaddafi’s ability to press defiantly ahead with a brutal campaign to reclaim land already lost to the rebels and squelch dissent within bastions of government control. The government appeared to be attempting to secure a buffer zone around Tripoli and target areas vital to the country’s oil industry, taking aim at cities and ports that have given the rebels a foothold close to the capital.

The White House expressed renewed alarm, saying that President Obama is “appalled by the use of force against unarmed, peaceful civilians.” Obama is being briefed on Libya three times a day, and “we’re not taking any options off the table,” said Jay Carney, the White House press secretary.

With thousands of refugees stuck on the Tunisian border with Libya, the U.S. Air Force flew in humanitarian supplies for them Friday aboard two C-130 cargo planes and planned to return Saturday to pick up Egyptian refugees and fly them home.

The fiercest attack on Friday fell on the opposition-held city of Zawiyah, home to one of Libya’s largest oil refineries and situated just 27 miles west of Tripoli. Official Libyan media claimed the government had retaken the city, though the rebels there denied it. As of late Friday, however, the city remained under siege.

“We are still in the square,” said Mohamed Magid, an opposition spokesman. “Zawiyah has not fallen.”

Gaddafi loyalists armed with tanks and heavy machine guns and reportedly led by his son, Khamis Gaddafi, launched an offensive around midday, rebels said. Forces loyal to Gaddafi entered the city from several directions, using tanks, SUVs and trucks armed with heavy machine guns, witnesses said. They also laid siege to the city with mortar fire.

Though details were impossible to verify, witnesses in Zawiyah said at least 15 people were killed and 200 wounded, with a senior rebel leader reported to be among the dead. Some reports put the death toll as high as 50.

The Cable reports:

Libyan Ambassador to the United States Ali Aujali, who joined the opposition in the early days of the crisis, issued an urgent plea for the United States to take more aggressive actions against the Libyan government in an interview with Foreign Policy today.

Aujali strongly supported the implementation of a no-fly zone over Libya, calling it “a historic responsibility for the United States.” He also criticized the arguments about the risks of no-fly zone, which have been made by U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates and other military officials. “When we say, for example, that the no-fly zone will take a long time, that it is complicated — please don’t give this regime any time to crush the Libyan people,” he said.

The ambassador, who began his diplomatic career four decades ago, raised the flag of the Libyan opposition over the ambassador’s residence in Washington after resigning last week. He told Foreign Policy that he decided to resign following Saif al-Qaddafi’s speech on Feb. 21, in which Qaddafi’s favored son warned protesters of “rivers of blood” if they did not cease their demonstrations.

Aujali warned that further delay in organizing an international response raised the risk that Qaddafi would be able to reconstitute his strength. “Time means losing lives, time means that Qaddafi will regain control,” he said. “He has weapons, he has rockets with about 450 kilometers’ distance, and we have to protect the people. These mercenaries now are everywhere.”

The Guardian reports:

Britain is to send a team of experts capable of giving military advice into eastern Libya to make contact with opposition leaders as the struggle for control of the country escalates.

The move is a clear intervention on the ground to bolster the anti-Gaddafi uprising, learn more about its leadership, and see what logistical support it needs. Whitehall sources said the diplomatic taskforce would not be providing arms to the rebels, as there is an international arms embargo.

It came as Libya’s deputy foreign minister, Khaled Kaim, said that Tripoli had accepted a peace initiative put forward by Venezuela’s president Hugo Chávez, which was heavily criticised by the White House. Kaim said it stated that a committee would be formed by African, Asian and Latin American countries “to help the international dialogue and to help the restoration of peace and stability”.

Interpol issued a global alert against Muammar Gaddafi and 15 other Libyans, including his daughter and seven sons, in an effort to enforce sanctions.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebooktwitterrss
Facebooktwittermail

4 thoughts on “This is war, not revolution

  1. Vince J.

    Lets not forget that those bullets use by pro Gaddafi goons were supplied by the UK and the US.

  2. Andrew

    President Obama is “appalled by the use of force against unarmed, peaceful civilians.”

    That’s his job.

  3. Colm O' Toole

    I wonder if Obama was “appalled by the use of force against unarmed, peaceful civilians” when the United States bombed six children collecting firewood in Afghanistan the other day.

    As Chris Floyd mentioned its also ironic that the US has supported referring Gaddaffi to the International Criminal Court even when the US still refuses to recognise the International Criminal Court.

    As for “Britain is to send a team of experts capable of giving military advice into eastern Libya to make contact with opposition leaders as the struggle for control of the country escalates.” I have also read that France and the US have also sent “military advisors” as they are innocently called to Eastern Libya. When Hugo Chavez first warned that the US was planning on invading Libya for its oil I was sceptical. Now with “miltary advisors” in the country his claims take on a new urgency.

  4. Christopher Hoare

    Well, you’re damned if you do and damned if you don’t. No doubt any Western help for the rebels will come with strings attached, but without the outside support the rebels will be wiped out in a matter of months. What are 20,000 African mercenaries if not outside support?

    Where are the other Moslem nations in this? The Arab dictator regimes are clearly for Qaddhafi, although they do not admit it — they are desperate for the uprisings to peter out before they are engulfed. (pun intended) The Libyan insurrection has as much international support as had the legitimate government of Spain when the fascist scum under Franco was empowered to destroy it.

    The ongoing consequences will be in the memories of those who have suffered and been abandoned. It is the neo-liberal world that has deserted them; made excuses why they may not assist those who rise up against tyranny; deliberately armed the murderers with the tools to massacre their own people; put forward the mealy-mouthed apologists for the status quo in the disguise of ‘stability’. There is more shame in the wind than will alight on any one administration, but it will never be forgotten.

Comments are closed.