Supreme Court delivers another blow to American democracy

The New York Times reports: The Supreme Court on Wednesday issued a major campaign finance decision, striking down some limits on federal campaign contributions for the first time. The ruling, issued near the start of a campaign season, will change and most likely increase the already large role money plays in American politics.

The decision, by a 5-to-4 vote along ideological lines, with the Court’s more conservative justices in the majority, was a sequel of sorts to Citizens United, the 2010 decision that struck down limits on independent campaign spending by corporations and unions. But that ruling did nothing to affect the other main form of campaign finance regulation: caps on direct contributions to candidates and political parties.

Wednesday’s decision in McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, No. 12-536, addressed that second kind of regulation.

It did not affect familiar base limits on contributions from individuals to candidates, currently $2,600 per candidate in primary and general elections. But it said that overall limits of $48,600 by individuals every two years for contributions to all federal candidates violated the First Amendment, as did separate aggregate limits on contributions to political party committees, currently $74,600.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., writing for four justices in the controlling opinion, said the First Amendment required striking down the limits. “There is no right in our democracy more basic,” he wrote, “than the right to participate in electing our political leaders.”

Dissenting from the bench, Justice Stephen G. Breyer called the decision a blow to the First Amendment and American democracy. “If the court in Citizens United opened a door,” he said, “today’s decision may well open a floodgate.” [Continue reading…]

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

2 thoughts on “Supreme Court delivers another blow to American democracy

  1. Steve

    The Yanks really do have a problem. Their constititution formulated in the 18th century for 18th century conditions does not work well with the 21 century and yet it is law and they must adhere to what it says. An interesting conundrum.

  2. Norman

    This ruling cements the destruction of the U.S.Constitution, which we have seen from other Supreme Courts in other Countries, bowing to the powers at hand. Next I suppose they will ban humans as being in the labor force, to be replaced with Robots instead. Perhaps those Robots will come equipped with A.I. and replace the Supreme Court Justices.

Comments are closed.